Fixed the og image (#46443)

## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.

YES

## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Fixed the imgThumb link in the post so that it is image only, ensuring
it won't be cropped in the blog main page.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
* Updated blog thumbnail/OG image configuration for improved preview
display when sharing.
* Revised survey content: the "Primary Database" chapter and its stat
label now reference Postgres instead of Supabase.

<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->

[![Review Change
Stack](https://storage.googleapis.com/coderabbit_public_assets/review-stack-in-coderabbit-ui.svg)](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46443?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)

<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

apps/www/_blog/2026-05-26-protecting-your-supabase-projects-from-npm-supply-chain-attacks.mdx

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ description: 'How Supabase is responding to npm supply chain attacks and practic
 author: katerina_skroumpelou
 date: '2026-05-26'
 imgSocial: 'https://zhfonblqamxferhoguzj.supabase.co/functions/v1/generate-og?template=platform&layout=icon-text&copy=Protecting+projects+from%0A%5Bnpm+supply+chain+attacks%5D&icon=supabase.svg'
-imgThumb: 'https://zhfonblqamxferhoguzj.supabase.co/functions/v1/generate-og?template=platform&layout=icon-text&copy=Protecting+projects+from%0A%5Bnpm+supply+chain+attacks%5D&icon=supabase.svg'
+imgThumb: 'https://zhfonblqamxferhoguzj.supabase.co/functions/v1/generate-og?template=ruler&layout=icon-only&copy=Protecting+projects+from%0A%5Bnpm+supply+chain+attacks%5D&icon=supabase.svg'
 categories:
   - security
 tags:

apps/www/data/surveys/state-of-startups-2026.tsx

@@ -366,11 +366,11 @@ const stateOfStartupsData = {
         {
           title: 'Primary Database',
           description:
-            'Supabase went from 76% to 82%. Every legacy NoSQL option lost share: MongoDB dropped 5%, MySQL 3%, Firebase 2%. Neon, DynamoDB, and Convex appeared as options for the first time and took small but measurable shares.',
+            'Postgres went from 76% to 82%. Every legacy NoSQL option lost share: MongoDB dropped 5%, MySQL 3%, Firebase 2%. Neon, DynamoDB, and Convex appeared as options for the first time and took small but measurable shares.',
           stats: [
             {
               percent: 82,
-              label: 'Startups using Supabase as a database',
+              label: 'Startups using Postgres as a database',
               source: { column: 'databases', aggregation: 'multi', target: 'Supabase' },
             },
             { percent: 60, label: 'Startups with Node.js in their backend stack' },