Files
supabase/apps/studio
Pamela Chia 5db8a0e960 feat(studio): instrument sign-in attempts and failures (#49853)
The /sign-in page emitted only a pageview on entry and the success-side
`sign_in` event on exit: failed or abandoned attempts were invisible, so
"never interacted" and "tried and failed silently" could not be told
apart in the sign-in funnel. I added an unsampled `sign_in_submitted`
event at every initiation point and classified failure capture via
`dashboard_error_created` with a new `signin` origin.

**Changed:**
- **Submit attempts observable**: `sign_in_submitted` (method: `email`,
provider id, `sso`, or partner) fires from the DOM submit handler on the
password and SSO forms (so submits that fail client-side validation
still count), and from the OAuth, custom-provider, and partner
initiation handlers.
- **Failures classified**: each sign-in error path feeds the existing
funnel-error pipe with origin `signin` and a controlled reason slug
(`invalid_credentials`, `email_not_confirmed`, `captcha_failed`,
`sso_provider_not_found`, ...). GoTrue auth errors now classify via
their numeric `status`, guarded so transport failures (`status: 0`) stay
`network_error`.
- **Attempt events survive the OAuth redirect**: the telemetry event
POST sends with `keepalive` (scoped to `sign_in_submitted`, since
keepalive requests share a per-page in-flight body quota), so a
dispatched request is no longer aborted by the provider navigation; send
rejections are caught centrally instead of surfacing as unhandled
rejections. The fetch still dispatches after an async token lookup, so
preview testing verifies the GitHub-path event actually lands on the
wire.
- **Captcha rejection is no longer silent**: a rejected hCaptcha
challenge resolves the stuck loading toast with an error message, emits
`captcha_challenge_failed` (distinct from `captcha_failed`, which stays
reserved for the auth server rejecting a submitted token), reports to
error monitoring, and resets the captcha widget (previously: unhandled
promise rejection and a spinner that never resolved).
- **Partner method validated**: the partner sign-in page resolves the
URL-hash value against the provider registry and forwards the canonical
provider id into `method` on both `sign_in_submitted` and `sign_in`;
anything unregistered records as `unregistered_partner`, so a crafted
link can't poison the breakdown on either event.

**Note:** failure events stay on the shared 10%
`dashboard_error_created` sampling rate (a per-origin carve-out would
break cross-source volume comparability); the unsampled attempt event
carries the tried-vs-never-interacted signal at full volume.

## To test

Tested on Vercel preview (studio-staging, wire-level network capture +
staging ingestion check):
- [x] On `/sign-in`, submit a bogus email + password: expect a `POST
*/platform/telemetry/event` request with `action: sign_in_submitted`,
`method: email` in the network tab, plus an error toast. Observed: 201,
auth returned 400 as expected.
- [x] Submit with an empty password: expect `sign_in_submitted` to still
fire (validation failures count as attempts). Observed: event fired with
201 and no auth call followed.
- [x] Click "Continue with GitHub": expect `sign_in_submitted` with
`method: github` on the wire before the provider redirect. Observed: the
POST completed (201) before the browser landed on github.com, so the
keepalive path holds.
- [x] Negative case: fresh page load with no interaction fires no
`sign_in_submitted`.
- [x] Ingestion: all fired events (methods `email`, `github`, plus
organic `sso` submits from a real login on the same preview) arrived in
the staging project with the expected properties.
- [x] Re-ran the email and GitHub paths on the scoped-keepalive build
(`129bf8d`): both `sign_in_submitted` POSTs returned 201 (the GitHub one
completed despite the provider redirect), and both events ingested into
the staging project with the expected `method`/`category` properties.

## Linear
- GROWTH-1165 (no `fixes` keyword on purpose: the evidence checks run on
prod data post-deploy, and the issue closes manually after they pass)


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Improved sign-in protection with more reliable invisible CAPTCHA
handling.
* Added sign-in submission tracking across password, SSO, partner,
custom OAuth, and external-provider flows.
* Added detailed classification for authentication, validation, CAPTCHA,
provider, and network errors.

* **Bug Fixes**
  * Sign-in now stops safely and resets CAPTCHA when verification fails.
* Improved error reporting for failed sign-in attempts, including
redirects and OAuth flows.
* Ensured sign-in telemetry is delivered reliably during OAuth
redirects.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-09-02 19:02:37 +08:00
..

Supabase Studio

A dashboard for managing your self-hosted Supabase project, and used on our hosted platform. Built with:

What's included

Studio is designed to work with existing deployments - either the local hosted, docker setup, or our CLI. It is not intended for managing the deployment and administration of projects - that's out of scope.

As such, the features exposed on Studio for existing deployments are limited to those which manage your database:

  • Table & SQL editors
    • Saved queries are unavailable
  • Database management
    • Policies, roles, extensions, replication
  • API documentation

Managing Project Settings

Project settings are managed outside of the Dashboard. If you use docker compose, you should manage the settings in your docker-compose file. If you're deploying Supabase to your own cloud, you should store your secrets and env vars in a vault or secrets manager.

How to contribute?

  • Branch from master and name your branches with the following structure
    • {type}/{branch_name}
      • Type: chore | fix | feature
      • The branch name is arbitrary — just make sure it summarizes the work.
  • When you send a PR to master, it will automatically tag members of the frontend team for review.
  • Review the main contributing guide to help test your feature before sending a PR.
  • The Dashboard is under active development. You should run git pull frequently to make sure you're up to date.

Developer Quickstart

Note

Supabase internal use: To develop on Studio locally with the backend services, see the instructions in the internal infrastructure repo.

# You'll need to be on Node v22
# in /studio

## For external contributors
pnpm install # install dependencies
pnpm run dev # start dev server

## For internal contributors
## First clone the private supabase/platform repo and follow instructions for setting up mise
mise studio  # Run from supabase/platform alongside `mise infra`

## For all
pnpm run test # run tests
pnpm run test -- --watch # run tests in watch mode

Running within a self-hosted environment

Follow the self-hosting guide to get started.

cd ..
cd docker
docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f ./dev/docker-compose.dev.yml up

Once you've got that set up, update .env in the studio folder with the corresponding values.

POSTGRES_PASSWORD=
SUPABASE_ANON_KEY=
SUPABASE_SERVICE_KEY=

Then run the following commands to install dependencies and start the dashboard.

npm install
npm run dev

If you would like to configure different defaults for "Default Organization" and "Default Project", you will need to update the .env in the studio folder with the corresponding values.

DEFAULT_ORGANIZATION_NAME=
DEFAULT_PROJECT_NAME=