Files
supabase/apps/studio/tests
6236ee9ef9 POC: bring back MSW to remove the pattern of vi.mock (#46439)
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.

YES

## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Right now our tests for API mocking is using vi.mock and mocking that
query or fetch handler. This is not the right approach IMO, 2 years ago
@jordienr added MSW with some very powerful helpers. The idea is to move
component test that rely on API using MSW within ViteTest. Principles
are simple:
- Mock API responses
- Mount your component that uses API responses
- Tests and assert on UI 
- Added Skill for Clanker

This pattern is 100 times better than what we have

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Tests**
* Expanded and strengthened test suites for secrets, org lookup, support
flows, OAuth auth, and onboarding; mocks now use contract-backed
responses for more realistic coverage.

* **Documentation**
* Added a comprehensive guide describing a standardized pattern for
component tests that mock network requests.

* **Chores**
* Improved test helpers, typing for API mocks, and test runner
configuration for more reliable and maintainable tests.

<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->

[![Review Change
Stack](https://storage.googleapis.com/coderabbit_public_assets/review-stack-in-coderabbit-ui.svg)](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46439?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)

<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Alaister Young <alaister@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alaister Young <10985857+alaister@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-28 12:58:50 +00:00
..

UI Testing Notes

Rules

  • All tests should be run consistently (avoid situations whereby tests fails "sometimes")

  • Group tests in folders based on the feature they are testing. Avoid file/folder based folder names since those can change and we will forget to update the tests.

Examples: /logs /reports /projects /database-settings /auth

Custom Render and Custom Render Hook

customRender and customRenderHook are wrappers around render and renderHook that add some necessary providers like QueryClientProvider, TooltipProvider and NuqsTestingAdapter.

Generally use those instead of the default render and renderHook functions.

import { customRender, customRenderHook } from 'tests/lib/custom-render'

customRender(<MyComponent />)
customRenderHook(() => useMyHook())

Mocking API Requests

To mock API requests, we use the msw library.

Global mocks can be found in tests/lib/msw-global-api-mocks.ts.

To mock an endpoint you can use the addAPIMock function. Make sure to add the mock in the beforeEach hook. It won't work with beforeAll if you have many tests.

beforeEach(() => {
  addAPIMock({
    method: 'get',
    path: '/api/my-endpoint',
    response: {
      data: { foo: 'bar' },
    },
  })
})

API Mocking Tips:

  • Keep mocks in the same folder as the tests that use them
  • Add a test to verify the mock is working

This will make debugging and updating the mocks easier.

test('mock is working', async () => {
  const response = await fetch('/api/my-endpoint')
  expect(response.json()).resolves.toEqual({ data: { foo: 'bar' } })
})

Mocking Nuqs URL Parameters

To render a component that uses Nuqs with some predefined query parameters, you can use customRender with the nuqs prop.


customRender(<MyComponent />, {
  nuqs: {
    searchParams: {
      search: 'hello world',
    },
  },
})

<Popover> vs <Dropdown>

When simulating clicks on these components, do the following:

// for Popovers
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
await userEvent.click('Hello world')

// for Dropdowns
import clickDropdown from 'tests/helpers'
clickDropdown('Hello world')