mirror of
https://github.com/supabase/supabase.git
synced 2026-10-05 01:15:03 +03:00
Closes [DOCS-1289](https://linear.app/supabase/issue/DOCS-1289/get-the-linter-to-fix-what-it-flags-or-retirereplace-the-linter) Stacked on #50600, which points contributors at the authoring skills. Merge that one first. ## Problem Contributors experienced friction with the linter. They felt nickle and dimed for tiny nits and felt detracted from the work itself. PRs would become noisy with tiny one-word suggestions. Additionally, our homegrown linter is not very intelligent, causing frequent overrides. ## Solution This removes the linter entirely in favor of directing contributors to use SKILLS instead. The removal entails... - **CI.** Delete the three `docs_lint` workflows: the PR check, the external-PR comment companion, and the nightly `--fix` bot. Drop the stale `zizmor.yml` ignore entry for the deleted workflow. - **Tooling.** Delete `supa-mdx-lint.config.toml` and the 14 rule files. Drop the `lint:mdx` script and the `@supabase/supa-mdx-lint` dependency from docs, learn, and ui-library, and regenerate the lockfile. - **Content.** Remove the 181 directives. A separate commit carries Prettier's reformatting of the tables and blank lines those comments had suppressed, so the deletion commit stays readable. No prose changes. - **Style guide.** The word list states each rule directly instead of describing what the linter flagged. Every term survives, including the phrase groups that mirrored `Rule004ExcludeWords`. - **Skills.** `write-the-docs`, `edit-the-docs`, and `review-the-docs` drop `pnpm lint:mdx` from their self-review commands and check the word list directly. `ask-the-docs`'s CI reference drops both workflows. ## Manual testing 1. Run `git grep -i supa-mdx-lint -- . ':!pnpm-lock.yaml'`. No matches. 2. Run `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --lockfile-only`. It passes, so the lockfile matches the three trimmed manifests. 3. Run `git diff master...HEAD --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR | grep -E '\.(md|mdx)$' | xargs npx prettier --config prettier.config.mjs --check`. All changed markdown passes. 4. Open the [reformatted filter table](https://docs-git-docs-retire-mdx-linter-supabase.vercel.app/docs/guides/observability/logs#filter-events) on the preview and compare it with [production](https://supabase.com/docs/guides/observability/logs#filter-events). The table renders the same. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Documentation** * Documentation guidance now uses manual prose and terminology review with the shared word list. * Clarified storage configuration and common Realtime channel mistakes. * Improved table formatting, text wrapping, and selected reference links. * Updated documentation authoring and review guidance. * **Chores** * Retired automated MDX linting from workflows and local validation commands. * Removed lint-suppression markers throughout documentation without changing instructions. * Added targeted documentation review guidance for pull requests. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
45 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
45 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
title: 'Project Pausing'
|
|
description: 'Free project pausing behavior.'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Supabase pauses Free Plan projects that show low activity over a 7-day period to save server resources. This guide explains how pausing works, how to restore a paused project, and how to avoid pausing altogether.
|
|
|
|
<Admonition type="note">
|
|
|
|
Projects under a paid plan cannot be paused and are not subject to automatic pausing for inactivity. To pause a project currently under a paid plan, first transfer the project to an organization on the Free plan.
|
|
|
|
</Admonition>
|
|
|
|
## How automatic pausing works
|
|
|
|
A Free plan project is considered inactive if it does not receive sufficient user database activity over the past week. Projects with too few user queries during that window are the clearest candidates for pausing. While you may be actively using the project, it's possible that usage is not enough to exclude it from automatic pausing. Typically a few user requests to the database each day over the previous week is enough to keep the project from being paused.
|
|
|
|
Supabase sends two emails to the project owner regarding project pausing:
|
|
|
|
1. A warning email roughly one week before the pause takes effect.
|
|
2. A confirmation email once the project has been paused.
|
|
|
|
After receiving an initial email warning, the pause can be prevented by taking one of the following steps:
|
|
|
|
- Visit the project from the [Supabase Dashboard](/dashboard/project/_) to generate activity.
|
|
- Generate a sufficient amount of activity by making API calls to your project or sending requests via your connected application.
|
|
|
|
## Restoring a paused project
|
|
|
|
You can restore a paused project for up to 1 year after it was paused:
|
|
|
|
1. Open the [Supabase Dashboard](/dashboard/organizations)
|
|
2. Select the organization, followed by the paused project
|
|
3. Click **Resume project** and confirm
|
|
|
|
The project will return to its previous state, including data and configurations.
|
|
|
|
### Restore window [#90-day-window-to-restore]
|
|
|
|
Once the project is paused, there is a 1-year window to restore the project on the platform from within Supabase Studio. The time limit exists because backups are only retained for a limited period, and platform changes may not be backward compatible with older backups. Unlike active projects, static backups can't be updated to accommodate such changes.
|
|
|
|
## Preventing automatic project pausing
|
|
|
|
To prevent future automatic pausing, upgrade to the Pro Plan from [Billing Settings](/dashboard/org/_/billing?panel=subscriptionPlan). Paid projects cannot be paused and are not subject to pausing for inactivity.
|