mirror of
https://github.com/supabase/supabase.git
synced 2026-10-06 09:55:06 +03:00
## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## Problem The Docs E2E link checker found broken links throughout docs, starting with `phone-login.mdx` pointing to `/docs/guides/cli/config` (404). Old links like `/docs/guides/cli/config` still work on the live site because `supabase.com` has redirects set up for them, but these links break on the docs preview site, which is what the E2E check tests against. These issues look clean on the live site, and I didn't catch them in my first pass because I was testing production instead of the preview. The E2E check only tests the ~20 pages a given PR happens to touch, so fixing the pages it flagged kept exposing more of the same problem one page at a time as each fix pulled in a new file. To stop chasing this incrementally, I cross-referenced every `/docs/guides/*` and `/docs/reference/*` redirect source in `apps/www/lib/redirects.js` against actual usage across all of `apps/docs`, and verified each candidate against the live preview. ## Solution Rather than updating the Docs E2E link checker, this PR resolves the links. **Why:** we own these docs, so keeping the links clean without redirects is keeping the house maintained. See [Broken Window Theory](https://blog.codinghorror.com/the-broken-window-theory/). Updated every link still using an old path to point straight at the current page instead of relying on a redirect. This covers old links like: - `/docs/guides/cli/config` → `/docs/guides/local-development/cli/config` - `/docs/guides/cli/getting-started` → `/docs/guides/local-development/cli/getting-started` - `/docs/guides/cli/local-development` → `/docs/guides/local-development/database-migrations` - `/docs/guides/cli/managing-environments` → `/docs/guides/deployment/managing-environments` - `/docs/guides/cli/seeding-your-database` → `/docs/guides/local-development/seeding-your-database` - bare `/docs/guides/cli` → `/docs/guides/local-development` - `/docs/guides/platform/compute-add-ons` → `/docs/guides/platform/compute-and-disk` - `/docs/guides/platform/shared-responsibility-model` → `/docs/guides/deployment/shared-responsibility-model` - `/docs/guides/database` → `/docs/guides/database/overview` - `/docs/reference/javascript`, `/docs/reference/dart`, `/docs/reference/kotlin`, `/docs/reference/python`, `/docs/reference/csharp` → their `/introduction` pages (the redirect's own destination, `/start`, turned out to be dead even on production — a separate bug in `redirects.js` I didn't touch here) - and about 35 more of the same pattern, listed in the commit messages Also fixed a handful of dead heading anchors found along the way (links that resolve to the right page but point at a `#section` that got renamed or moved), including the original `#bigquery` anchor and a few in `connecting-to-postgres.mdx` where content moved to its own dedicated page. Left alone on purpose: - `content/guides/cli.mdx` — this page has no route in the docs app at all (no `app/guides/cli/` directory), so it 404s even in production before the `www` redirect ever fires. Fixing its internal link wouldn't change that; it needs an actual routing/content decision, not a link fix. - A few candidates that already resolve fine as-is (`pg_partman`, bare `/docs/reference/api`, bare `/docs/reference/cli`) — confirmed via curl, left untouched. ## Manual testing 1. Confirmed every new link target actually exists by checking the destination file/page and matching heading anchors. 2. Cross-referenced every `/docs/guides/*` and `/docs/reference/*` redirect source in `apps/www/lib/redirects.js` against real usage in `apps/docs`, and curl-verified each old path (404) and new path (200) against the live PR preview before fixing it. 3. Ran the Docs E2E link checker locally against changed pages. 4. Spot-checked the original broken link from CI (`/docs/guides/cli/config`) to confirm it now points to a working page.
46 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext
46 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
id: 'maturity-model'
|
|
title: 'Maturity Model'
|
|
description: 'Growing with your application.'
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Supabase is great for building something very fast _and_ for scaling up. However, it's important to note that as your application matures and your team expands, the practices you use for managing an application in production should not be the same as the practices you used for prototyping.
|
|
|
|
## Prototyping
|
|
|
|
The Dashboard is a quick and easy tool for building applications while you are prototyping. That said, we strongly recommend using [Migrations](/docs/guides/deployment/database-migrations) to manage your database changes. You can use our CLI to [capture any changes](/docs/reference/cli/supabase-db-diff) you have made on the Dashboard so that you can commit them a version control system, like git.
|
|
|
|
## Collaborating
|
|
|
|
As soon as you start collaborating with team members, all project changes should be in version control. At this point we strongly recommend moving away from using the Dashboard for schema changes. Use migrations to manage your database, and check them into your version control system to track every change.
|
|
|
|
Resources:
|
|
|
|
- [Database migrations](/docs/guides/deployment/database-migrations)
|
|
- [Managing access on the Dashboard](/docs/guides/platform/access-control)
|
|
- [PGAudit for Postgres](/docs/guides/database/extensions/pgaudit)
|
|
|
|
## In production
|
|
|
|
Once your application is live, you should never change your database using the Dashboard - everything should be done with [Migrations](/docs/guides/deployment/managing-environments#create-a-new-migration). Some other important things to consider at this point include:
|
|
|
|
- The Dashboard has various [access levels](/docs/guides/platform/access-control) that can prevent changes being made via the UI.
|
|
- Design a [safe workflow](/docs/guides/deployment/shared-responsibility-model#you-decide-your-own-workflow) for managing your database. We strongly recommend running [multiple environments](/docs/guides/deployment/managing-environments) as part of your development workflow (`local` -> `staging` -> `prod`).
|
|
- Do not share any production passwords with your team, _especially_ your `postgres` password. All changes should be made via version-controlled migrations which run via a bastion host or a CI platform (like [GitHub Actions](/docs/guides/deployment/managing-environments#configure-github-actions). If you use GitHub Actions, use [approval workflows](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/reviewing-deployments) to prevent any migrations being run accidentally.
|
|
- Restrict production access to your database using [Network Restrictions](/docs/guides/platform/network-restrictions).
|
|
- As your database to grows, we strongly recommend moving to [Point-in-Time Recovery](/docs/guides/platform/backups#point-in-time-recovery). This is safer and has less impact on your database performance during maintenance windows.
|
|
- Read the [Production Checklist](/docs/guides/deployment/going-into-prod) and familiarize your team with the [Shared Responsibilities](/docs/guides/deployment/shared-responsibility-model) between your organization and Supabase.
|
|
|
|
Resources:
|
|
|
|
- [Database migrations](/docs/guides/deployment/database-migrations)
|
|
- [Managing access on the Dashboard](/docs/guides/platform/access-control)
|
|
- [PGAudit for Postgres](/docs/guides/database/extensions/pgaudit)
|
|
- [Managing environments](/docs/guides/deployment/managing-environments)
|
|
|
|
## Enterprise
|
|
|
|
For a more secure setup, consider running your workload across several organizations. It's a common pattern to have a Production organization which is restricted to only those team members who are qualified to have direct access to production databases.
|
|
|
|
Reach out to [growth](https://forms.supabase.com/enterprise) if you need help designing a secure development workflow for your organization.
|