## Context
Initial ground work for Marketplace Integrations (feature flagged under
the flag `marketplaceIntegrations`), in which some integrations will be
fetched over a network request (than hard-coded within the repo).
Feature flag just controls whether to we need to fetch them.
Similarly, categories under "Explore" will also be fetched, and the flag
just decides whether that should be enabled.
We're also planning to update the overview tab for integrations as well,
in which integrations fetched over the network request will use the new
UI (altho not functional just yet)
## To test
Note that the LOC changes are seemingly large, but that's just because
I've added in a types file for the Supabase project that we're using to
store the integrations data
- [x] Verify that behaviour is status quo with the flag off (Priority)
- [x] Verify that behaviour is status quo on CLI / self-host env
- [x] Verify that with the flag on you'll see one of the new
integrations fetched over network (Grafana), including an additional
category "Observability" (and clicking into it will show the new UI)
- [x] Verify that all other existing integrations are status quo
---------
Co-authored-by: Katerina Skroumpelou <sk.katherine@gmail.com>
When a session token is refreshed server-side, `@supabase/ssr` writes
the updated JWT via Set-Cookie. If a CDN caches that response and serves
it to another user, that user will be signed in as the wrong person.
Adds documentation covering this in two places:
- creating-a-client.mdx: brief mention with a link to the full
explanation
- advanced-guide.mdx: expands the existing CDN FAQ with an explanation
of the risk and Cache-Control: private, no-store examples for Next.js
and Nuxt
Related: https://github.com/supabase/supabase-js/issues/1682
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Stacked PR 2/5 for page title improvements. Includes Auth, Database,
editors, and Edge Functions layout title adoption.
_Base:
[dnywh/feat/page-titles](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43538)_
---
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
- Resolves FE-1960
- Resolves FE-1983
- Resolves DEPR-207
## What is the current behavior?
Page titles between surfaces are inconsistent and vague. Sometimes they
say the product name:
```
My Project | My Org | Supabase
```
...even when on a specific surface like Database > Tables.
Other times they show the entity name but skip over the project or org
name :
```
Edge Functions | Supabase
```
## What is the new behavior?
Auth, Database, editors, and Edge Functions adopt the layout title
format introduced in https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43538:
```
users | Table Editor | My Project | My Org | Supabase
hello-world | Logs | Edge Functions | My Project | My Org | Supabase
Backups | Database | My Project | My Org | Supabase
Authentication | My Project | My Org | Supabase
```
That format is:
entity, section, surface, project, org, brand
## Additional context
Related stacked PRs also based on the the original
[dnywh/feat/page-titles](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43538)
branch:
- https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43535
- https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43536
- https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43537
---------
Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Right now the new filter bar just does not work on mobile. It fully
collapses and does not appear correctly. This make it stack on smaller
screens and shows it to be visible. Works on smaller tabs
Note: there is a bit of awkwardness on certain screen sizes where its
one long row, will fix that later. This is better than nothing right now
## Problem
Editing a column from the schema visualiser requires many clicks
## Solution
When hovering over a column in the schema visualiser, an edit button
should appear on the right side. Clicking this button should open the
column edit pane on the right side of the screen. This would reduce the
number of clicks required and allow users to make edits directly from
the visualiser instead of using it only as a visual aid.
## Problem
The Phase 1 mw_diag monitoring dashboard wasn't showing any data despite
the middleware PR (#43413) being live in production.
Next.js `response.cookies.set()` URL-encodes cookie values, so
`hit=1&would_stamp=0&has_cookie=0` becomes
`hit%3D1%26would_stamp%3D0%26has_cookie%3D0` in `document.cookie`. Our
`parseMwDiagCookie` was passing that encoded string directly to
`URLSearchParams`, which splits on literal `&` and `=` — the encoded
`%26`/`%3D` delimiters were invisible to it. Result: `params.get('hit')`
always returned `null`, so every diagnostic cookie was silently dropped.
## Changes
- Add `decodeURIComponent()` before `URLSearchParams` in
`parseMwDiagCookie`
- Add 3 test cases covering URL-encoded cookie values (matching what
Next.js actually produces in production)
## Testing
- All 34 unit tests pass (31 existing + 3 new)
- Verified locally with Playwright: manually set the URL-encoded cookie
format on localhost:8082, confirmed `parseMwDiagCookie` now returns
`{hit: true, ...}` and the data flows through to `PageTelemetry`
GROWTH-625
When saving Data API settings with only max rows changes (no
table/function privilege changes), updateExposedEntities sent an empty
string to pg-meta/query which failed server-side validation with 'String
must contain at least 1 character(s)'. Early return when there are no
SQL parts to execute.
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Docs update
## What is the new behavior?
Adds visual and more context to the egress troubleshooting guide. Adds
major updates to edge function's 546 troubleshooting guide
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
docs update
## What is the current behavior?
n/a
## What is the new behavior?
n/a
## Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
doc
## What is the current behavior?
Doc incorrectly states physical backups are not enabled by default.
## What is the new behavior?
Backup doc page now correctly clarifies physical backups are enabled by
default,
assuming project is eligible.
## Additional context
NA
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR changes the logic for show/hide password icon in the sign up
form. Fix#39399 and #41459
## What is the current behavior?
For Password Field Eye Icon Label
<ul>
<li>When password is hidden: Button shows "Hide password" label
(incorrect).
<li>When password is visible: Button shows "Show password" label
(incorrect)
</ul>
For Edge Functions Secrets
<ul>
<li>All secret values are always visible in plain text
<li>No visibility toggle functionality exists
<li>No way to hide/show individual secret values
</ul>
## What is the new behavior?
Sign-up Form Password Field:
<ul>
<li>When password is hidden: Button correctly shows "Show password"
label
<li>When password is visible: Button correctly shows "Hide password"
label</ul>
Labels now accurately describe what clicking the button will do
<p></p>
Edge Functions Secrets:
<ul>
<li>Secret values are hidden by default (security-first approach)
<li>Each secret has its own independent visibility toggle button
<li>Hidden secrets display as bullet points (•••••••••••••••••••••)
<li>Eye icon appears when secret is hidden - click to reveal
<li>EyeOff icon appears when secret is visible - click to hide
<li>Tooltip shows "Hidden" when value is masked, actual value when
visible</ul>
---------
Co-authored-by: Gildas Garcia <1122076+djhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alaister Young <a@alaisteryoung.com>
Remove duplicate table assignment using undefined `supabase` variable
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
docs update
## What is the current behavior?
-
## What is the new behavior?
-
## Additional context
-
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Simplified the Python API client examples in the generating Python
types guide by removing redundant code assignments, making the
documentation clearer and easier to follow.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
docs update, added my name
## What is the current behavior?
N/A
## What is the new behavior?
N/A
## Additional context
Onboarding task
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Updated team roster documentation.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
**Changes:**
- Add function exposure controls to Data API settings
- Adds a per-function GRANT/REVOKE UI to the Data API settings page,
alongside the existing table selector.
- Empty state: shows "No tables/functions available" instead of "0 of 0
X exposed" when there's nothing to show
- Renamed update-exposed-tables-mutation →
update-exposed-entities-mutation to handle both tables and functions in
one save
**Decisions of note:**
- Functions are grouped by schema.name across overloads — toggling one
entry grants/revokes `EXECUTE` on all overloads
- Only normal and window functions are shown (`prokind in ('f', 'w')`) —
triggers and aggregates are excluded
---
**To test:**
- Table and schema selectors still works end-to-end
- Toggling a function and saving updates the count label and applies the
grant (check via SQL Editor: select * from
information_schema.role_routine_grants where routine_schema = 'public')
- Functions in unexposed schemas are dimmed and unclickable
- With no functions in the selected schemas, the selector label reads
"No functions available" and the dropdown shows the same
## Problem
When editing email templates or edge functions, users may navigate away
from the page without a warning indicating they may loose their changes.
This is because we only handle the `beforeunload` event when we should
also handle NextJS routing events.
This is actually done for the observability reports.
## Solution
Extract the logic from the observability reports into a reusable
component and use it where needed
## How to test
On staging, for each case:
- Authentication email templates
- Observability reports
- Edge functions creation
- Edge functions edition
Test:
- Modify the template/report/function
- Navigate away using either the sidebar link, the browser back button
or closing the tab
- Cancel navigation in the confirmation dialog
- Navigation should be prevented and you should not loose your changes
Test:
- Modify the template/report/function
- Navigate away using either the sidebar link, the browser back button
or closing the tab
- Confirm navigation in the confirmation dialog
- Navigation should not be prevented and you should have lost your
changes
Updated the secret creation command for Supabase Vault to use 'anon_key'
instead of 'publishable_key'.
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
docs
https://supabase.com/docs/guides/functions/schedule-functions
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Updated code examples in the schedule functions guide to reflect
correct Supabase key naming conventions.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature — A/B experiment for a new pricing calculator on the `/pricing`
page, gated behind a PostHog feature flag.
## What is the current behavior?
The pricing page shows a single compute pricing section
(`PricingComputeSection`) to all visitors with no experimentation
support.
## What is the new behavior?
- Introduces a **pricing calculator A/B experiment**
(`pricingCalculatorExperiment`) using PostHog feature flags evaluated
client-side.
- **Control variant**: Renders the existing `PricingComputeSection` (no
change).
- **Test variant**: Renders a new `NewPricingComputeSection` with:
- A plan selector toggle (Pro / Team)
- An interactive compute calculator with slider-based instance sizing
- Ability to add/remove multiple project instances
- Live monthly cost estimate breakdown (plan + compute - credits)
- Expandable compute pricing table with detailed specs
- Adds `getFeatureFlag` and `onFeatureFlags` methods to the shared
`PostHogClient` for client-side flag evaluation on www pages (where
server-side evaluation lacks full person context).
## Additional context
- The experiment is scoped to the `/pricing` page only.
- New components (`NewPricingComputeSection`,
`NewComputePricingCalculator`) are created alongside the existing ones —
the control path is completely untouched.
- Feature flag evaluation happens client-side because www pages don't
have full person context on the server.
- Telemetry type `PricingCalculatorExperimentExposedEvent` is added to
`telemetry-constants.ts`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sean Oliver <882952+seanoliver@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mert YEREKAPAN <mertyerekapan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mert YEREKAPAN <33198490+myerekapan@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
The `homeNew` PostHog experiment has concluded. This PR graduates it by
making the new homepage (`ProjectHome`, formerly `HomeV2`) the permanent
default for all users, and removes all dead code from the old
experiment.
## Changes
- Remove `homeNew` PostHog feature flag checks and `home_new` experiment
exposure tracking from 3 files
- Rename `HomeNew/` → `ProjectHome/` directory and `HomeV2` →
`ProjectHome` export
- Delete old `Home/Home.tsx` component (shared components like
`ProjectList/` are kept — still used by org pages)
- Delete `pages/project/[ref]/building.tsx` and add a server-side
redirect from `/project/:ref/building` → `/project/:ref` to prevent 404s
during rollout (old cached JS bundles may still route to `/building`)
- Simplify `ContentWrapper` building-state logic in `ProjectLayout` —
always redirect building projects to home, always suppress building
interstitial on home page
- Always route to `/project/{ref}` after project creation (remove
`/building` path)
- Update all Observability imports from `HomeNew` → `ProjectHome`
## Self-hosted behavior change
Self-hosted Studio previously showed the old `Home` component (client
libraries + example projects) since PostHog flags don't load. This PR
changes self-hosted to show `ProjectHome` (TopSection with service
status + instance diagram, advisor, custom reports). All sections query
backend APIs that exist on self-hosted. E2E tests pass against the
self-hosted build.
## Testing
- [x] `pnpm turbo run build --filter=studio` passes
- [x] No remaining references to `homeNew`, `home_new`, or `HomeNew` in
codebase
- [x] No broken imports to deleted files
- [x] Self-hosted E2E tests pass (145 passed, 1 flaky, 4 skipped)
- [x] `/building` redirect added to both platform and self-hosted config
blocks
**Quick test:**
1. Navigate to any project homepage — should render the ProjectHome
component
2. Create a new project — should redirect to `/project/{ref}` (not
`/building`)
3. Visit a project in `COMING_UP` state on a non-home route — should
redirect to home
4. Visit `/project/{ref}/building` directly — should 302 redirect to
`/project/{ref}`
## Linear
- fixes GROWTH-671
## Context
We reached to a consensus that we'll keep manually written queries
within the `pg-meta` package
I'll shift queries over in several PRs but wanted to double check if the
changes here is a good folder structure
## Changes involved
- Am organizing dashboard queries in `pg-meta` based on product
- So folder structure will be `/sql/studio/[product]/*.ts`
- Every constant will be exported directly from `pg-meta`'s index
- So consumption in dashboard will just be `import { xxx } from
'@supabase/pg-meta`
cc @avallete and @soedirgo on this one - lemme know if this is alright,
or if there's a preferred way to do this
PostHog flagged our SDK as outdated — we were on 1.257.2, latest is
1.357.0.
**Changes**
- Bumped `posthog-js` in `packages/common/package.json` from `^1.257.2`
to `^1.333.0` (resolved to 1.357.0)
- Updated lockfile
**Why is the lockfile diff so large?**
posthog-js added several new dependencies between 1.257.2 and 1.357.0: a
full `@opentelemetry/*` stack (for opt-in log exporting),
`@posthog/core` and `@posthog/types` (internal monorepo split),
`dompurify`, and `query-selector-shadow-dom`. None of these affect our
bundle unless explicitly enabled — they're opt-in features. The lockfile
entries are large because pnpm records each package with its full
resolution tree and checksums.
**Testing**
Spun up the full local stack and verified all three PostHog endpoints
return 200 with the new SDK version:
- `/e/` (event capture) — pageviews firing correctly
- `/flags/` (feature flag evaluation) — flags loading correctly
- `/i/v0/e/` (identify) — user identification working
No breaking changes in any of the 16 releases between our old and new
version (all Minor/Patch Changes). TypeScript compilation clean across
all apps.
GROWTH-589
Bug fix
## What is the current behavior?
Read-only users cannot download files because the download feature
requires minting a temporary API key, which is properly blocked for
read-only users.
## What is the new behavior?
Instead of using temporary API keys, we now create signed URLs for the
files to be downloaded. We batch-create signed URLs for an entire
folder's worth of files, requiring only a single management API call,
then use those signed URLs to download the files. This allows read-only
users to download files without needing elevated permissions.
## Additional context
Resolves FE-2737
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
- Added filter by value for the new feature bar experience
- Will follow up with an E2E test later
## Problem
The `_sb_first_referrer` cookie isn't working. The www middleware
matcher explicitly excludes `/dashboard` and `/docs`, so the cookie
never gets stamped for Studio or Docs traffic. PostHog confirmed: only 1
event with `first_referrer_cookie_present=true` out of ~46.5M Studio
pageviews in the last 7 days.
## Background: what the matcher does
In Next.js, the `matcher` config controls which incoming requests the
middleware function even runs on. If a path doesn't match, the
middleware is skipped entirely — the request passes through untouched.
If it matches, the middleware runs and can mutate the response (set
cookies, headers, etc.).
This matters because Studio's SPA navigation works via silent
`/_next/data/` JSON fetches. If middleware runs on those requests and
returns `NextResponse.next()` with any mutations, it breaks those
fetches and causes full page reloads instead of client-side transitions.
## What we tried before
| PR | www runs on `/dashboard`? | Studio `proxy.ts` runs on all routes?
| Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| **#42768** (Attempt 1) | ✅ Yes — and also intercepts `_next/data` | ✅
Yes — `matcher` config removed, stamps cookie everywhere | Full page
reloads in Studio |
| **#43129** (Full revert) | ❌ No — www middleware deleted entirely | ❌
No — restored to `matcher: '/api/*'` only | Back to baseline, no cookie
stamping anywhere |
| **#43153** (Attempt 2) | ❌ No — `/dashboard` explicitly excluded | ✅
Yes — `matcher` config removed again, stamps cookie everywhere | Full
page reloads in Studio again |
| **#43189** (Attempt 3) | ❌ No — same as #43153 | ✅ Yes — `matcher`
config still removed, cookie stamping made conditional | Still broken |
| **#43190** (Ivan's fix) | ❌ No — `/dashboard` still excluded | ❌ No —
restored to `matcher: '/api/*'` only | Works — but cookie never stamps
for `/dashboard` traffic |
| **#43413** (this PR) | ✅ Yes — sets diagnostic cookie only, no
attribution stamping yet | ❌ No — unchanged, still `matcher: '/api/*'`
only | ❓ Untested in prod |
The common factor in every failure: Studio's `proxy.ts` ran on all
routes (including `_next/data` requests), which broke SPA navigation.
This PR is the first one that runs www middleware on `/dashboard` while
Studio's `proxy.ts` stays in its original narrow `/api/*` scope.
## What changed
This is Phase 1 of a two-phase rollout. We remove `dashboard|docs` from
the matcher's negative lookahead so www middleware runs on those paths —
but instead of stamping cookies, we set a short-lived (60s) diagnostic
cookie `_sb_mw_diag` on `/dashboard` and `/docs` requests.
The diagnostic cookie encodes
`hit=1&would_stamp={0|1}&has_cookie={0|1}`, which Studio telemetry reads
on the initial pageview and reports to PostHog as `mw_diag_hit`,
`mw_diag_would_stamp`, and `mw_diag_has_existing_cookie` properties.
A cookie rather than a header because response headers aren't readable
by JS. It also tests the actual Set-Cookie mutation path that Phase 2
will use (which is what Next.js issue #41885 is specifically about).
Phase 1 answers two key questions before we commit to Phase 2:
1. Does expanding the matcher break Studio SPA navigation?
2. What % of /dashboard arrivals would get a first-referrer cookie
stamped in Phase 2?
## Phase 2 readiness criteria
**Important caveat**: `mw_diag_*` data reflects consented users only and
may under-represent first-visit anonymous traffic. The Phase 2 decision
should account for this — the actual middleware execution rate is likely
higher than what PostHog reports.
### PostHog query spec
**Middleware execution rate**: Of all Studio initial pageviews on
`/dashboard` or `/docs` paths, what percentage have `mw_diag_hit =
true`? Expected: >= 90%. Below 70% warrants investigation (could
indicate edge caching bypassing middleware, or a matcher configuration
issue).
```
Filter: event = "$pageview" AND (current_url contains "/dashboard" OR current_url contains "/docs")
Breakdown: mw_diag_hit (true vs null/missing)
Metric: count(mw_diag_hit = true) / count(all) * 100
```
**Would-stamp rate**: Of events with `mw_diag_hit = true`, what
percentage have `mw_diag_would_stamp = true`? This tells us what
percentage of Phase 2 traffic would actually get a cookie stamped. No
hard threshold — unexpected values (< 5% or > 95%) suggest a logic bug
worth investigating before Phase 2.
```
Filter: event = "$pageview" AND mw_diag_hit = true
Breakdown: mw_diag_would_stamp (true vs false)
Metric: count(mw_diag_would_stamp = true) / count(all) * 100
```
**Existing cookie rate**: Of events with `mw_diag_hit = true`, what
percentage have `mw_diag_has_existing_cookie = true`? This tells us how
many users already have the cookie from a prior www visit.
```
Filter: event = "$pageview" AND mw_diag_hit = true
Breakdown: mw_diag_has_existing_cookie (true vs false)
Metric: count(mw_diag_has_existing_cookie = true) / count(all) * 100
```
### Go / no-go threshold table
| Signal | Go | Investigate | No-Go |
|---|---|---|---|
| `mw_diag_hit` rate (% of /dashboard+/docs pageviews) | >= 90% | 70-90%
| < 70% |
| SPA navigation errors (Sentry / Vercel logs) | No increase | < 0.1%
increase | > 0.5% increase |
| Middleware p99 latency (Vercel function logs) | < 50ms added |
50-100ms | > 100ms |
| Sample volume in first 24h | > 1,000 events | 100-1,000 (extend
window) | < 100 (insufficient data) |
## Changes
- `apps/www/middleware.ts`: Removed `dashboard|docs` from matcher; added
`isDashboardOrDocs` guard that sets `_sb_mw_diag` diagnostic cookie
instead of stamping attribution
- `apps/www/middleware.test.ts`: 12 tests covering cookie stamping on
www paths, diagnostic cookie encoding for all scenarios (external
referrer, direct nav, internal referrer, existing cookie)
- `packages/common/first-referrer-cookie.ts`: Exported
`MW_DIAG_COOKIE_NAME`, `MwDiagData` type, and `parseMwDiagCookie()`
helper
- `packages/common/telemetry.tsx`: Reads `_sb_mw_diag` on initial Studio
pageview; reports `mw_diag_*` properties to PostHog
## Testing
Unit tests pass (13/13 www, 31/31 first-referrer-cookie). Production
validation needed:
- [ ] Studio SPA navigation works (tab changes, SQL editor, no full page
reloads)
- [ ] PostHog shows `mw_diag_hit = true` on Studio initial pageviews
- [ ] `mw_diag_would_stamp` distribution looks reasonable before
enabling Phase 2
- [ ] Monitor 24h before Phase 2
Ref: GROWTH-625 / GROWTH-668
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This is something we've discussed for a while. A shared place for error
codes and their mappings, descriptors etc. Available for all projects in
the monorepo.
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This introduces a small snippet preview of the error code coming via our
content API for the docs. This appears in a couple of places right now.
- **Auth Overview** - This page isn't fully released yet, but it appears
on the error codes table (as depicted below).
- **Logs** - When you delve into the logs panel, if there's an error
code available, they're also wrapped in this popover.
We are also working on a shared-data package (#43458) to potentially
replace this endpoint internally. Also introduces a multifaceted button
to debug/fix with either Assistant or LLM of choice.
| Auth Overview | Logs Panel |
|--------|--------|
| <img width="407" height="287" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-09 at 14 14 09"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7450dddb-6828-4cd3-802d-37d47ba1b440"
/> | <img width="394" height="216" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-09 at 14 13
56"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80c2a46e-dbe4-4e88-a0a7-68b977a71d6b"
/> |
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lays groundwork for online evals on Assistant chat logs.
https://www.braintrust.dev/docs/observe/score-online
### Changes
- New workflows:
- `braintrust-scorers-deploy.yml` keeps prod scorers in sync on push to
`master`
- `braintrust-preview-scorers-deploy.yml` deploys preview scorers to the
staging project for PRs labeled `preview-scorers`, posting a comment
with scorer links
([example](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43194#issuecomment-4000097222))
- `braintrust-preview-scorers-cleanup.yml` deletes preview scorers when
the PR is closed
([example](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43194#issuecomment-4000749847))
- Adds `evals/scorer-online.ts` entry point invoked with `pnpm
scorers:deploy`, registering scorers for online evals in the Braintrust
"Assistant" project
- Refactors scorer code to separate online-compatible scorers
(`scorer-online.ts`) from WASM-dependent ones (`scorer-wasm.ts`)
- "URL Validity" scorer now only checks Supabase domains to prevent
requests to untrusted origins
- Span `input` is now shaped `{ prompt: string }` instead of plain
`string` for compatibility with offline eval scorers
- Env vars `BRAINTRUST_STAGING_PROJECT_ID` and `BRAINTRUST_PROJECT_ID`
configured in GitHub repo settings
- `generateAssistantResponse` now uses `startSpan` + `withCurrent`
instead of `traced()` to manually manage the root span lifecycle — this
ensures `onFinish` logs output to the span _before_ `span.end()` is
called, which is when Braintrust triggers scoring automations
### Online Scorers
We share scoring logic across offline and online evals, but some of our
scorers aren't transferrable to an "online" setting due to runtime
challenges or ground truth requirements.
**Supported**
- Goal Completion
- Conciseness
- Completeness
- Docs Faithfulness
- URL Validity
**Unsupported**
- Correctness (requires ground truth output)
- Tool Usage (requires ground truth requiredTools)
- SQL Syntax (uses libpg-query WASM)
- SQL Identifier Quoting (uses libpg-query WASM)
### How to use these scorers
Going forward if you want to add/edit online eval scorers, add the
`preview-scorers` label to a PR. This deploys scorers to the [Assistant
(Staging
Scorers)](https://www.braintrust.dev/app/supabase.io/p/Assistant%20(Staging%20Scorers)?v=Overview)
project in Braintrust with branch-specific slugs, and comments on the PR
([example](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43194#issuecomment-4000097222)).
From the Braintrust dashboard you can "Test" the scorer with traces from
any project.
<img width="1866" height="528" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-05 at 15 15 00@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4f15cebc-3f2d-4e8a-9ee2-fe8ef7bf4199"
/>
Once merged, scorers are deployed to the primary
[Assistant](https://www.braintrust.dev/app/supabase.io/p/Assistant)
project, and preview scorers are deleted from the staging project. Down
the road, scorers on the Assistant project will run automatically on a
sample of production traces.
Closes AI-437
## Problem
- database e2e tests run in serial mode, which is slower
- they also are a bit flaky
## Solution
- Ensure they can run in parallel
- Make them more stable by using UI checks when waiting
- Use assertions that automatically wait/retry in playwright
Follow up of #43547 and #43560
## Problem
The cron job tests run in serial mode and can be flaky.
## Solution
- Use simple query to install the `pg_cron` extension (way faster than
using UI)
- Make sure all tests can run in parallel
## Problem
The `tableCreateGeneratePolicies` A/B experiment tested an AI-assisted
policy generator (`RLSManagement`) as a variation in the table creation
side panel. The variation didn't pass — control wins, so the standard
RLS checkbox should be the permanent behavior.
## Changes
- Deleted `useTableCreateGeneratePolicies` hook (PostHog flag + exposure
tracking)
- Deleted the entire `RLSManagement/` component directory (variation UI
— `RLSManagement`, `PolicyList`, `PolicyListEmptyState`,
`ToggleRLSButton`)
- Removed experiment flag checks from `TableEditor.tsx` — RLS checkbox
is now always rendered (was already the control)
- Removed experiment conversion tracking from `SidePanelEditor.tsx`
## Testing
Verified `pnpm typecheck` passes clean. Table creation side panel
renders the RLS checkbox unconditionally as it did in the control.
GROWTH-653
## Problem
The `projectCreationEnableRlsEventTrigger` A/B experiment tested showing
an opt-in "Enable automatic RLS" checkbox in the project creation flow,
which sets up a Postgres event trigger to auto-enable RLS on every new
table in the public schema. The test variant passed with a +3.3pp lift.
## Changes
- `SecurityOptions.tsx` — removed PostHog flag check, checkbox is now
always rendered
- `pages/new/[slug].tsx` — removed experiment flag reads, exposure
tracking (`useTrackExperimentExposure`), and the conditional
`rlsOptionVariant` telemetry property
The underlying feature logic (`enableRlsEventTrigger` form field,
`AUTO_ENABLE_RLS_EVENT_TRIGGER_SQL`, submission handling) is unchanged —
we're just removing the scaffolding that was gating it.
## Testing
Verified `pnpm typecheck` passes clean. The "Enable automatic RLS"
checkbox now shows unconditionally in the Security Options section of
project creation.
GROWTH-653
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Remove feature flag.
## What is the current behavior?
The [State of Startups](https://supabase.com/state-of-startups) page
instantly redirects to the homepage rather than staying put.
## What is the new behavior?
The [State of Startups](https://supabase.com/state-of-startups) page
rightfully loads.
## Additional context
Some sort of race condition with the `useFlag`. Simpler to just remove
the flag logic entirely and keep the page permanently on.
## Problem
- Some tests don't always cleanup after themselves or don't do it
consistently which make it hard to work on them locally
- Some test suites don't allow parallel execution of their tests
- Some tests are flaky
This a follow up of #43547
## Problem
e2e tests are still flaky and not as fast as they could be
## Solution
- [x] Reset supabase instance: this makes the database visualiser tests
faster as there are less tables to screenshot
- [x] Improve the single file setup utilities so that they never block
local tests by cleaning them up before starting
- [x] Disable animations while running the tests (less time waiting for
animations to complete
- [x] Add utility functions that help reproducing flaky tests locally
This PR updates @supabase/*-js libraries to version 2.99.0.
**Source**: supabase-js-stable-release
**Changes**:
- Updated @supabase/supabase-js to 2.99.0
- Updated @supabase/auth-js to 2.99.0
- Updated @supabase/realtime-js to 2.99.0
- Updated @supabase/postgest-js to 2.99.0
- Refreshed pnpm-lock.yaml
This PR was created automatically.
Co-authored-by: supabase-releaser[bot] <223506987+supabase-releaser[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
