## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
UI / design-system consistency (accessibility).
## What is the current behavior?
Keyboard focus rings are inconsistent across Studio and `packages/ui`:
- Custom Button uses thick `outline` with per-variant colours (brand /
grey / destructive / warning)
- Form controls use muted grey rings (`ring-background-control`)
- Tabs / NavMenu / Radio use soft brand `ring-ring`
- Studio `.inset-focus` uses dark green `outline-brand-600`
Related: [DEPR-354](https://linear.app/supabase/issue/DEPR-354).
## What is the new behavior?
One shared focus recipe, exposed as Tailwind `@utility` classes in
`packages/config/css/utilities.css`:
| Utility | Use when |
| --- | --- |
| `focus-ring` | Buttons, inputs, most controls (offset ring) |
| `focus-inset` | Dense/flush surfaces such as interactive table rows
(renamed from `inset-focus`) |
```txt
# focus-ring
outline-hidden
focus-visible:ring-2
focus-visible:ring-ring
focus-visible:ring-offset-2
focus-visible:ring-offset-background
```
Applied on Button, shadcn form controls, Menu/NavMenu, Command palette
trigger, Studio table rows, and related call sites. Documented in the
design-system accessibility docs. Variants do not change focus ring
colour.
When the ring must appear on a different element than the focused one
(e.g. Menu + ProductMenu `Link` via `group-focus-visible`, or InputGroup
via `:has()`), keep an explicit ring stack. The utilities bake in
`:focus-visible` on the same element.
## Additional context
**Out of scope**
- Full `packages/ui` / Studio / www sweep
- Legacy Studio form-group green box-shadow cleanup
- ESLint rule for bare `outline-none`
## Test plan
Prefer Safari (“hard mode” for `tabIndex`). Expect one soft brand ring
everywhere: not grey, not solid green outline.
### Design system
- [ ]
[Accessibility](https://design-system-git-dnywh-choreimprove-tab-focus-styles-supabase.vercel.app/design-system/docs/accessibility):
recipe docs match what you see
- [ ]
[Button](https://design-system-git-dnywh-choreimprove-tab-focus-styles-supabase.vercel.app/design-system/docs/components/button):
Tab primary / default / danger; same ring colour
- [ ] [Table → Row-level
navigation](https://design-system-git-dnywh-choreimprove-tab-focus-styles-supabase.vercel.app/design-system/docs/components/table#row-level-navigation):
Tab an interactive row; inset outline (`focus-inset`) sits inside the
row
### Studio
- [ ] **Org home → table view** (`/organizations/_` or org projects):
switch to the table layout, Tab onto a project row; inset outline sits
inside the row (list/card view uses CardButton, not `focus-inset`)
- [ ] **Project sidebar** (Database, Auth, Storage, …): Tab the main
product nav links; ring follows the focused item (not the nested section
menus like Tables / Roles)
- [ ] **Storage → Files**: Tab a bucket row; same inset outline as org
table rows
- [ ] **Project Settings → General** (or Compute and Disk): Tab through
inputs, checkboxes, switches, selects; same offset ring, no ring on
mouse click
- [ ] **Header ⌘K** (desktop width): Tab to the search control after
Feedback; same soft brand `focus-ring` (was a thicker
`ring-border-strong` before)
- [ ] **Table Editor or SQL Editor tabs**: focus a tab, Tab to × if
active; close shows a ring
- [ ] **Light + dark**: ring stays visible against both backgrounds
## Problem
- Organizations links are not accessible with keyboard
- Project list buttons are missing labels
- Headings should be sequential
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* Improved keyboard and screen-reader accessibility for project actions
and project reference copy controls.
* Added clearer tooltip guidance for copying a project reference.
* Updated project and organization card interactions for more consistent
click and focus behavior.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Problem
We now export components under a subpath in ui-patterns to avoid barrel
files as they slow down every tools (from IDE to linters, etc.) and may
also affect bundles our users have to download.
## Solution
- Remove the UI patterns index file
- Fix invalid impors
## Problem
Our `<Button>` component breaks the default `button` contract by
redefining the `type` prop to set its variant (`primary`, `default`,
etc) instead of the button type (`submit`, `button`, etc).
This is confusing and forces to write more code when using it with
shadcn components that expect/inject the standard button props.
## Solution
- rename the `type` prop to `variant`
- rename the `htmlType` prop to `type`
- propagate the changes where necessary
- format code
## How to test
As this is just prop renaming, if it builds it's ok
---------
Co-authored-by: Ivan Vasilov <vasilov.ivan@gmail.com>
This PR migrates the whole monorepo to use Tailwind v4:
- Removed `@tailwindcss/container-queries` plugin since it's included by
default in v4,
- Bump all instances of Tailwind to v4. Made minimal changes to the
shared config to remove non-supported features (`alpha` mentions),
- Migrate all apps to be compatible with v4 configs,
- Fix the `typography.css` import in 3 apps,
- Add missing rules which were included by default in v3,
- Run `pnpm dlx @tailwindcss/upgrade` on all apps, which renames a lot
of classes
- Rename all misnamed classes according to
https://tailwindcss.com/docs/upgrade-guide#renamed-utilities in all
apps.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jordi Enric <jordi.err@gmail.com>
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
UI improvements.
- Resolves DEPR-401
- Resolves DEPR-424
- Resolves DEPR-425
## What is the current behaviour?
Studio currently blurs two different concepts together:
- `billing_partner` / `billing_via_partner`, which represent real
billing ownership for marketplace-managed organisations such as AWS and
Vercel
- Stripe connection state, which is not actually partner billing in the
same sense, but was previously being mocked through the same UI paths
That made the Stripe work harder to reason about and left some local
behaviour dependent on temporary overrides rather than the API shape we
want to ship.
## What is the new behaviour?
This PR separates those concerns while keeping the existing AWS and
Vercel marketplace experience intact.
- AWS and Vercel continue to use `billing_partner` /
`billing_via_partner` for billing ownership, lockouts, and manage CTAs
- Stripe display state now comes from `integration_source`, which lets
Studio show Stripe-specific badges and alerts without treating Stripe as
a billing partner
- organisation-level partner UI is unified across AWS, Vercel, and
Stripe, including the org banner, navbar icon treatment, and
organisation cards
- project-level Stripe UI now appears only when the project itself is
marked as Stripe-connected, including the project switcher, project list
surfaces, and a project-level banner
- Stripe-connected organisations are no longer incorrectly blocked
behind the AWS/Vercel-style billing management alerts for invoices,
billing address, payment methods, or plan changes
- banner dismissal is scoped to the relevant org/project and
partner/integration state
## Review order
Most of the diff size here is regression tests and generated types. The
behavioural changes are concentrated in a smaller set of files.
Recommended review order:
1. `integration_source` vs `billing_partner` data-model split and
org/project query mapping
2. org-level UI: partner icon, org banner, org dropdown/card treatment
3. billing gating updates for Stripe vs AWS/Vercel
4. project-level Stripe UI: dropdown, list surfaces, banner
5. tests and generated types
| Stripe Org(s) |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Organizations Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d0ef338c-3b41-4c6d-b3bd-f21a2c182840"
/> |
| Vercel Org(s) |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Organizations Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1dc57770-3f24-45ac-840f-34680555cde8"
/> |
| AWS Org(s) |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Organizations Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7847dad0-ee30-4a65-ab0b-b3b16af0d34f"
/> |
| Stripe Org, Non-Stripe Project |
| --- |
| <img width="1152" height="885" alt="Mallet Toolshed
Supabase-1673E019-792C-462C-B6F8-C5DDB810B331"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/556fbea3-b5ae-4f2f-96b9-6f66c6654e4a"
/> |
| Stripe Org, Stripe Project |
| --- |
| <img width="1152" height="885" alt="Hammer Toolshed
Supabase-7E86C17C-561F-4221-BD16-EAFF7D41AAE0"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/94f8daf6-0320-413e-8d56-59f9acaaea15"
/> |
| Vercel Org |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Projects Toolshed
Supabase-A7891653-9366-4B99-89DD-789D70CD52E3"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c87ee6e8-4451-4866-a905-23a38b2593e3"
/> |
| AWS Org |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Projects Toolshed
Supabase-58A43ECE-569E-4541-9463-346A90B02CFF"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9350a180-4d58-42a1-ad1a-95893c2e8b12"
/> |
This also removes the old Stripe mock override path in Studio so the
frontend matches the intended API model more closely.
## ~~Dependencies~~ (merged!)
This work depends on the private platform change that exposes
`integration_source` on the relevant organisation and project payloads:
- https://github.com/supabase/platform/pull/31874
_Update: now merged._
## Local testing
### Stripe
If you have the private `platform` repo checked out locally, make sure
your local API returns `integration_source: 'stripe_projects'`
consistently for the Stripe-linked org/project you are testing.
Important responses:
- `/platform/organizations`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug/projects`
- `/platform/projects/:ref`
Verify:
- org banner and org icon show the Stripe connected state
- unopened and opened project switcher both show Stripe only for
Stripe-linked projects
- project cards / table rows show the Stripe chip only for Stripe-linked
projects
- the project-level Stripe banner appears across project surfaces
- billing address, tax ID, invoices, payment methods, and plan changes
remain editable in Studio for Stripe orgs
### Vercel
Use a Vercel Marketplace org with real `billing_partner` /
`billing_via_partner` values.
Important org-level endpoints for local mocking in `platform`:
- `/platform/organizations`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug/billing/subscription`
Project-level Vercel indicators still come from
`/platform/integrations/:slug`, not `integration_source`.
### AWS
Use an AWS Marketplace org with real `billing_partner` /
`billing_via_partner` values.
Important org-level endpoints for local mocking in `platform`:
- `/platform/organizations`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug/billing/subscription`
AWS does not currently have a Stripe-like project-level indicator in
these org/project payloads.
## Notes
- `billing_partner` is no longer the right abstraction for the
Stripe-connected case in this PR. It remains the source of truth for
marketplace billing ownership, while Stripe currently uses
`integration_source` as a connection/display signal.
- I re-ran `pnpm api:codegen` while tightening this PR and kept only the
generated type changes this branch actually depends on, to avoid
unrelated API drift in the review.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Stripe Projects integration added for billing and project flows
* Partner icons/badges shown across org and project lists, dropdowns,
and rows
* Dismissible, partner-specific marketplace/integration banners with
contextual CTA behavior
* Improved partner-billing detection to drive billing UI and
invoice/plan availability
* **Tests**
* Extensive new test coverage for billing UI, partner-managed fallbacks,
banners, icons, and related flows
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Vasilov <vasilov.ivan@gmail.com>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR introduces some visual indicators when a Nano project is
exhausting resources on Pro plus plans. The indicator tells the user a
free upgrade to Micro is available via a flashing Nano badge that guides
them to Upgrade and a global banner that notifies them resources are
near exhaustion, please upgrade for free.
| Project List | Project View |
|--------|--------|
| <img width="412" height="223" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-31 at 16 11 19"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0d0e7727-e4eb-4ade-9024-528a2501596c"
/> | <img width="1256" height="618" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-31 at 16 11
10"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b664e020-2b18-4842-8e64-4e49fac69eef"
/> |
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Free Micro Upgrade banner appears for nano-tier projects near compute
exhaustion with animated visuals and an “Upgrade for free” CTA.
* Compute badge highlights near-exhaustion with glow/shimmer and an
animated upgrade indicator; optional icon support added.
* Per-project banner dismissal is saved locally; dismissed banners
remain hidden.
* **Tests**
* Added tests covering banner display and dismissal scenarios.
* **Chores**
* Added local-storage keys and telemetry events for banner and upgrade
interactions.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Minor nit I wanted to address. Adds "more actions" to the projects list
view so you can delete projects in line (eventually batch delete maybe?)
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Dropdown actions on project cards and rows: copy project reference
with visual feedback and delete project action.
* Delete confirmation modal accepts optional organization/project
context.
* Mini bar-chart metrics added to project cards for quick DB health
visualization.
* Header-focused card layout and compact project metadata for clearer
presentation.
* **Bug Fixes / UX**
* Improved copy-to-clipboard feedback with toasts and icons.
* Table header adjusted for proper column alignment.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
* init
* Infinite scrolling pagination for projects in table view
* Infinite scrolling pagination for projects in cards view
* Shift searching projects to URL state + to server side
* Shift status filter to URL state
* opt to use local storage query for view moe
* update wildcard project route
* add created at value, and shift filter status to server side
* Nit
* final nit
* Address comments
* Fix
* Prettier
* Raise page limit to 96
* integrations refine
* refactoring
* integration page updates
* div
* clean up
* prettier
* Couple of minor refactors and fixes
* Fix missing base path for integration card image
* Fix editing a cron job in the previous job run tab, not updating the cron job details in the page header
* Cron job bread crumb to use job name instead of id if available, and add loading state for cron job subtitle
* Fixy fix
* Small fi
* ANother one
* Do not reroute after purging queue
* nit
* Final final final v3
---------
Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
Danny White