mirror of
https://github.com/supabase/supabase.git
synced 2026-10-06 01:45:10 +03:00
master
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
dcac820571 |
feat(studio): add assistant notebook run tool (#49361)
## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Assistant feature and data-handling plumbing. ## Stack context This stack is based on #49352 (`chore/assistant-tool-outcomes`) and assumes #49350–#49352 merge first. Review bottom to top: 1. #49361 — assistant notebook run tool 2. #49362 — assistant notebook run UI 3. #49364 — terminal-state polish ## What is the current behavior? The Assistant can read and edit notebooks, but it cannot execute all saved query cells as one approved operation. ## What is the new behavior? - Adds a `run_notebook` tool with one approval gate for the complete notebook. - Executes database and log cells sequentially in notebook order. - Rejects stale runs when the notebook changed after the Assistant read it. - Resolves primary and read-replica connections and forwards authorization to log and replica requests. - Shares rows with the model only when the organization's AI data-sharing level permits it. - Strictly validates and sanitizes persisted notebook-run output before replaying message history. - Registers the tool in prompts, filtering, mocks, and tool construction. ## How to test manually This is the tool/data layer; use the top-of-stack preview from #49364 for the complete UI while checking these behaviors. 1. In Explorer, create and save a notebook named **Assistant run smoke test** with: - a markdown cell - a working database query - a working Logs query - a database query that returns no rows, such as `select 1 where false` 2. Open the AI Assistant and ask: **Read the “Assistant run smoke test” notebook and analyze it using its current results.** 3. Confirm the Assistant reads the notebook and requests one `run_notebook` approval for all query cells, rather than requesting one approval per cell. 4. Approve the run. Confirm database and Logs queries execute in notebook order, the markdown cell is not executed, and the Assistant responds only after the complete run finishes. 5. Start another run but do not approve it yet. In another tab, edit and save the notebook. Return to the pending approval and approve it. 6. Confirm the stale run is rejected, the Assistant reads the latest notebook version, and a new approval is required. 7. Optional privacy check: set the organization AI data-sharing level to schema-only, run a query containing a recognizable value, and confirm the value remains visible in the notebook result UI but is not repeated in the Assistant's answer. ## Automated test `mise exec node@22 -- pnpm --dir apps/studio exec vitest --run lib/ai/tool-filter.test.ts lib/ai/tools/index.test.ts lib/ai/tools/mock-tools.test.ts lib/ai/tools/notebook-tools.test.ts lib/ai/tools/tool-sanitizer.test.ts` 80 tests pass at this stack boundary. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Added AI-assisted notebook execution for database and log cells, with approval, freshness checks, replica support, and per-cell error handling. - Added notebook deletion and database discovery and validation for notebook management. - Added configurable privacy controls for notebook results. - Added request header support for analytics SQL execution. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved replica lookup handling so other notebook cells can continue when one lookup fails. - Prevented invalid, unauthorized, or overly detailed notebook execution results from being exposed. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com> Co-authored-by: Saxon Fletcher <SaxonF@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
ec1c889349 |
feat(studio): logs SQL brands + execution data layer (#48301)
## I have read the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file. YES ## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Feature (data layer only — PR 1 of the SQL-editor query-source stack; nothing user-visible yet, no consumers). ## What is the current behavior? The Studio SQL editor only runs queries against Postgres. There is no type-safe brand for user-authored logs SQL and no execution/normalization layer for running SQL against the logs/analytics (ClickHouse) backend. ## What is the new behavior? Pure additions, no behavior change: - `data/logs/safe-analytics-sql.ts` — adds distinct untrusted/safe brands for user-authored logs SQL (`UntrustedLogSqlFragment`, `untrustedLogSql`, `acceptUntrustedLogsSql`), mirroring pg-meta's `UntrustedSqlFragment` but kept intentionally disjoint so Postgres and logs SQL can never cross boundaries. - `data/logs/execute-logs-sql-mutation.ts` (new) — `executeLogsSql` wraps `executeAnalyticsSql`, attaches the resolved time range as request params (`iso_timestamp_start/end`, never spliced into SQL), and normalizes to `{ rows, error? }`; `mapLogsError` normalizes the analytics backend's structured 200-body error into the `{ message }` shape the result pane reads; `useExecuteLogsSqlMutation` collapses transport and 200-body errors into React Query's single `onError` path. - Unit tests for `mapLogsError`, the brands (including compile-time disjointness vs pg-meta brands), and safe composition. Verification: `pnpm test:studio` (new suites, 26 passed), `pnpm typecheck`, `lint:ratchet` (no new warnings), and Prettier all pass. ## Additional context <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Added the ability to run user-authored logs SQL with resolved start/end timestamps. * Normalized query error handling so failures surface a clear message (including sensible fallbacks) and integrates with mutation error flows (with a default error toast when not customized). * Introduced safety branding for logs SQL fragments, including promotion to runnable safe SQL. * **Tests** * Added tests covering error normalization across multiple malformed/empty error shapes. * Added tests ensuring logs SQL branding preserves/accepts only the intended types and rejects unsafe inputs. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |