Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
85743d7215 feat: branching support for temporary access (#45411)
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.

YES

## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

feature


## Additional context

Needs API deployment, adds a toggle to allow roles to only be available
on branch projects


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Added a "Branches only" option for JIT database access grants;
included when grants are submitted.

* **UI**
* Configuration UI shows an informational notice and hides
temporary-access controls when preview branches are managed from the
main branch.
* Feature preview label changed to "Temporary access"; badge text now
reads "Preview".

* **Tests**
  * Unit test updated to cover branches-only serialization.

<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->

[![Review Change
Stack](https://storage.googleapis.com/coderabbit_public_assets/review-stack-in-coderabbit-ui.svg)](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/45411?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)

<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Danny White <3104761+dnywh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
2026-05-18 09:47:59 +02:00
Danny White 05fc4aca13 chore(studio): clean up temporary access response typing (#45354)
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Cleanup.

## What is the current behavior?

Temporary access still has a couple of leftover JIT fallback messages
and an unnecessary local unavailable-reason type after the Platform
response types were split into `JitAccessResponse` and
`JitStateResponse`.

## What is the new behavior?

Studio relies on the generated `JitStateResponse` discriminated union
for the toggle warning and uses temporary access copy consistently in
the remaining fallback toasts.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Improvements**
* Refined error messaging for temporary database access grant and revoke
operations.
* Enhanced condition detection for toggle failure warnings in database
access configuration.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-04-29 14:12:33 +08:00
bedb2efb87 chore(studio): JIT access UI improvements (#44161)
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

UI and copywriting improvements for temporary access.

## What is the current behavior?

The temporary access UI still used older JIT/ephemeral naming in some
places, did not clearly explain the setup requirements, and had to infer
unavailable states from Platform error message text.

## What is the new behavior?

The settings UI now uses temporary access naming consistently, explains
that temporary access uses short-lived tokens for manual database
connections, and renders clearer unavailable states for projects that
require either a Postgres upgrade or a platform migration.

The Studio query now consumes Platform’s structured `unavailableReason`
contract instead of parsing human-readable error strings, so the UI owns
the copy while Platform owns the eligibility reason.

Validation:

- `pnpm eslint
components/interfaces/Settings/Database/JitDatabaseAccess/JitDbAccessConfiguration.tsx
data/jit-db-access/jit-db-access-query.ts`
- `pnpm tsc --noEmit --pretty false`

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* IP range input now supports one CIDR range per row with add/remove
rows and form integration.

* **Documentation**
* Replaced “JIT” wording with “Temporary” / “Ephemeral token-based”
access across UI, dialogs, toasts, and help links.
  * Added minimum PostgreSQL version requirement (17.6.1.081+).

* **Improvements**
  * Per-row CIDR validation with precise nested error messages.
* Refined layout spacing and moved the temporary-access configuration
earlier in Database settings.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Etienne Stalmans <etienne@supabase.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
2026-04-28 17:26:59 +10:00
1ab7251060 chore(studio): clarify partnered orgs and projects (#44328)
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

UI improvements.

- Resolves DEPR-401
- Resolves DEPR-424
- Resolves DEPR-425

## What is the current behaviour?

Studio currently blurs two different concepts together:

- `billing_partner` / `billing_via_partner`, which represent real
billing ownership for marketplace-managed organisations such as AWS and
Vercel
- Stripe connection state, which is not actually partner billing in the
same sense, but was previously being mocked through the same UI paths

That made the Stripe work harder to reason about and left some local
behaviour dependent on temporary overrides rather than the API shape we
want to ship.

## What is the new behaviour?

This PR separates those concerns while keeping the existing AWS and
Vercel marketplace experience intact.

- AWS and Vercel continue to use `billing_partner` /
`billing_via_partner` for billing ownership, lockouts, and manage CTAs
- Stripe display state now comes from `integration_source`, which lets
Studio show Stripe-specific badges and alerts without treating Stripe as
a billing partner
- organisation-level partner UI is unified across AWS, Vercel, and
Stripe, including the org banner, navbar icon treatment, and
organisation cards
- project-level Stripe UI now appears only when the project itself is
marked as Stripe-connected, including the project switcher, project list
surfaces, and a project-level banner
- Stripe-connected organisations are no longer incorrectly blocked
behind the AWS/Vercel-style billing management alerts for invoices,
billing address, payment methods, or plan changes
- banner dismissal is scoped to the relevant org/project and
partner/integration state

## Review order

Most of the diff size here is regression tests and generated types. The
behavioural changes are concentrated in a smaller set of files.

Recommended review order:

1. `integration_source` vs `billing_partner` data-model split and
org/project query mapping
2. org-level UI: partner icon, org banner, org dropdown/card treatment
3. billing gating updates for Stripe vs AWS/Vercel
4. project-level Stripe UI: dropdown, list surfaces, banner
5. tests and generated types

| Stripe Org(s) |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Organizations Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d0ef338c-3b41-4c6d-b3bd-f21a2c182840"
/> |

| Vercel Org(s) |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Organizations Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1dc57770-3f24-45ac-840f-34680555cde8"
/> |

| AWS Org(s) |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Organizations Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7847dad0-ee30-4a65-ab0b-b3b16af0d34f"
/> |

| Stripe Org, Non-Stripe Project |
| --- |
| <img width="1152" height="885" alt="Mallet Toolshed
Supabase-1673E019-792C-462C-B6F8-C5DDB810B331"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/556fbea3-b5ae-4f2f-96b9-6f66c6654e4a"
/> |

| Stripe Org, Stripe Project |
| --- |
| <img width="1152" height="885" alt="Hammer Toolshed
Supabase-7E86C17C-561F-4221-BD16-EAFF7D41AAE0"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/94f8daf6-0320-413e-8d56-59f9acaaea15"
/> |

| Vercel Org |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Projects Toolshed
Supabase-A7891653-9366-4B99-89DD-789D70CD52E3"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c87ee6e8-4451-4866-a905-23a38b2593e3"
/> |

| AWS Org |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Projects Toolshed
Supabase-58A43ECE-569E-4541-9463-346A90B02CFF"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9350a180-4d58-42a1-ad1a-95893c2e8b12"
/> |

This also removes the old Stripe mock override path in Studio so the
frontend matches the intended API model more closely.

## ~~Dependencies~~ (merged!)

This work depends on the private platform change that exposes
`integration_source` on the relevant organisation and project payloads:

- https://github.com/supabase/platform/pull/31874

_Update: now merged._

## Local testing

### Stripe

If you have the private `platform` repo checked out locally, make sure
your local API returns `integration_source: 'stripe_projects'`
consistently for the Stripe-linked org/project you are testing.

Important responses:

- `/platform/organizations`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug/projects`
- `/platform/projects/:ref`

Verify:

- org banner and org icon show the Stripe connected state
- unopened and opened project switcher both show Stripe only for
Stripe-linked projects
- project cards / table rows show the Stripe chip only for Stripe-linked
projects
- the project-level Stripe banner appears across project surfaces
- billing address, tax ID, invoices, payment methods, and plan changes
remain editable in Studio for Stripe orgs

### Vercel

Use a Vercel Marketplace org with real `billing_partner` /
`billing_via_partner` values.

Important org-level endpoints for local mocking in `platform`:

- `/platform/organizations`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug/billing/subscription`

Project-level Vercel indicators still come from
`/platform/integrations/:slug`, not `integration_source`.

### AWS

Use an AWS Marketplace org with real `billing_partner` /
`billing_via_partner` values.

Important org-level endpoints for local mocking in `platform`:

- `/platform/organizations`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug`
- `/platform/organizations/:slug/billing/subscription`

AWS does not currently have a Stripe-like project-level indicator in
these org/project payloads.

## Notes

- `billing_partner` is no longer the right abstraction for the
Stripe-connected case in this PR. It remains the source of truth for
marketplace billing ownership, while Stripe currently uses
`integration_source` as a connection/display signal.
- I re-ran `pnpm api:codegen` while tightening this PR and kept only the
generated type changes this branch actually depends on, to avoid
unrelated API drift in the review.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
  * Stripe Projects integration added for billing and project flows
* Partner icons/badges shown across org and project lists, dropdowns,
and rows
* Dismissible, partner-specific marketplace/integration banners with
contextual CTA behavior
* Improved partner-billing detection to drive billing UI and
invoice/plan availability

* **Tests**
* Extensive new test coverage for billing UI, partner-managed fallbacks,
banners, icons, and related flows
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Vasilov <vasilov.ivan@gmail.com>
2026-04-23 12:17:24 +10:00
Charis 3b7052b5a9 cleanup: fix import order and prefixes for studio/data (#44501) 2026-04-03 09:15:57 +02:00
c198a61951 feat: UI for managing jit database access (#43735)
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.

YES

## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

feature


## Additional context

Adds a feature flagged UI for toggling JIT based access to a project's
database and managing permissions/access

---------

Co-authored-by: Danny White <3104761+dnywh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
2026-03-24 15:22:38 +08:00