## Problem
platform, v1 and v2 have been already completely migrated and introduced
some changes.
Some types have been renamed, some outputs and inputs updated.
## Solution
- Update the API types
- Fix the TS errors
## Update
Taking this over to unblock #50134, which needs the new scoped token
permission ids from the regenerated types.
- Merged `master`.
- Regenerated `api-v2.d.ts` from the production spec. The previous files
came from a local API that exposed a webhook events endpoint production
doesn't have yet. Production has since added standardized 400 error
responses on the v2 organization endpoints. `api-v1.d.ts` and
`platform.d.ts` already matched production.
- Fixed `verify-production-types`. It formatted the regenerated files in
a temp directory outside the repository, so Prettier fell back to its
defaults and the comparison could never match the committed files. It
now passes the repository config explicitly. `pnpm api:verify-types`
passes on this branch.
- Verified locally: `pnpm typecheck`, `pnpm api:verify-types`, Studio
unit tests.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* Preserved descriptions when saving, sharing, moving, or unsharing
notebooks, reports, SQL snippets, and saved queries.
* Improved handling of empty or null values across notebook
descriptions, billing usage, pooler settings, and infrastructure fields.
* Improved read-replica connection handling, including read-only
connection strings.
* Updated storage configuration and capability handling to match current
settings.
* **API and Compatibility**
* Updated organization, project, storage, OAuth, billing, and
infrastructure data handling to match current API responses.
* OAuth app creation and updates now require scopes.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Alaister Young <10985857+alaister@users.noreply.github.com>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Right now our tests for API mocking is using vi.mock and mocking that
query or fetch handler. This is not the right approach IMO, 2 years ago
@jordienr added MSW with some very powerful helpers. The idea is to move
component test that rely on API using MSW within ViteTest. Principles
are simple:
- Mock API responses
- Mount your component that uses API responses
- Tests and assert on UI
- Added Skill for Clanker
This pattern is 100 times better than what we have
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Tests**
* Expanded and strengthened test suites for secrets, org lookup, support
flows, OAuth auth, and onboarding; mocks now use contract-backed
responses for more realistic coverage.
* **Documentation**
* Added a comprehensive guide describing a standardized pattern for
component tests that mock network requests.
* **Chores**
* Improved test helpers, typing for API mocks, and test runner
configuration for more reliable and maintainable tests.
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46439?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Alaister Young <alaister@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alaister Young <10985857+alaister@users.noreply.github.com>
