The embeddings workflow started failing after #46163 with `ENOENT: ...
content/reference/javascript/v2/sections.json`. That PR routed the JS v2
search ingest through the new reference pipeline
(`loadClientLibReferenceFromNewPipeline` in
`apps/docs/scripts/search/sources/reference-doc.ts`), and updated
`predev` and `prebuild` to run both `codegen:references` and
`codegen:references:new`, but missed `preembeddings`. This chains
`codegen:references:new` into `preembeddings` so `pnpm run embeddings`
(and the `:nimbus` / `:refresh` variants that fan out to it) produces
the new pipeline output before the search ingest reads it.
# Second try of making a new better process for SDK automation
Instead of building a new pipeline. We will take the lessons learned
form round 1, plus the good design and improvement on DX quality for
drop-in file as a single step required from SDK team and produce almost
identical set of files as used right now to render using the current
pipeline.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* New reference-content pipeline producing per-library reference
artifacts and integrating into prebuilds, search ingestion, and
rendering (type-aware examples).
* **Documentation**
* Added comprehensive JavaScript SDK v2 reference content and partials
(Auth MFA, passkeys, admin, TypeScript support, filters, modifiers,
Installing, Initializing, Buckets, etc.).
* **Tests & CI**
* Added regression snapshot test and updated workflows to refresh
reference snapshots and ensure spec downloads.
* **Chores**
* Updated ignore rules, build scripts, Makefile targets, and package
lifecycle hooks.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Katerina Skroumpelou <mandarini@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Katerina Skroumpelou <sk.katherine@gmail.com>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
I am new to Supabase (yay!) and so must declare myself officially as a
human rather than bot.
## What is the current behavior?
My name is not included. ☹️
## What is the new behavior?
My name _is_ included. 😄
## Additional context
None.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Updated team contributor information.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Adds myself to `humans.txt` per onboarding instructions
## What is the current behavior?
n/a
## What is the new behavior?
n/a
## Additional context
n/a
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Updated team contributors list with a new team member.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
During the migration to make `PREVIEW` match `PRODUCTION` environment we
got a negation wrong.
With this fix, now wrappers pages are rendered statically on build, so
we can catch errors on MDX syntax on the fly.
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bug fix (documentation) — fixes three internal links that currently 404.
## What is the current behavior?
Three docs pages link to internal paths that do not resolve (no matching
page, and no redirect in `apps/www/lib/redirects.js`):
| File | Link | Problem |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `guides/telemetry/reports.mdx` (×3) |
`/docs/content/guides/database/query-optimization` | Stray `content/`
path segment (the content folder name leaked into the public URL) |
| `guides/database/prisma.mdx` |
`/docs/guides/database/prisma-troubleshooting` | Page lives under the
`prisma/` subfolder |
| `guides/database/postgres/data-deletion.mdx` |
`/docs/blog/postgres-bloat` | Blog posts are served from `/blog`, not
`/docs/blog` |
No related issue — these are self-evident broken links found by checking
every internal `/docs/...` link against the actual pages, the redirects
config, and the dynamic doc routes.
## What is the new behavior?
The links now point to the correct, existing pages:
- `/docs/guides/database/query-optimization` (page:
`apps/docs/content/guides/database/query-optimization.mdx`)
- `/docs/guides/database/prisma/prisma-troubleshooting` (page:
`apps/docs/content/guides/database/prisma/prisma-troubleshooting.mdx`)
- `/blog/postgres-bloat` (post:
`apps/www/_blog/2024-04-26-postgres-bloat.mdx`; consistent with the ~30
other `/blog/...` links across the docs)
Docs-only change; no wording changes beyond the URLs. The `reports.mdx`
tables were re-aligned by Prettier as a result of the shortened links.
## Additional context
For each link I confirmed the target page/post file exists, that the
broken path has no rule in `apps/www/lib/redirects.js`, and that it is
not served by a dynamic Next.js route under `apps/docs/app/`.
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Adds Lukas Klingsbo to the humans.txt
## What is the current behavior?
There is no Lukas Klingsbo in humans.txt
## What is the new behavior?
There is a Lukas Klingsbo in humans.txt
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Updated team information with a new team member addition.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Adds my name to the public-facing `humans.txt` endpoint on
`supabase.com`.
## What is the current behavior?
Existing humans listed without me.
## What is the new behavior?
I become listed as another human. 🎉
## Additional context
I think that's enough already. 😈
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Updated team information in public documentation.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
After improving error handling on guides loader, of course, an error
emerged about a missing partial that doesn't exist anymore within the
project.
Removing the partial importing within MDX to fix search embedding
script.
**I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md file.**
YES
**What kind of change does this PR introduce?**
Docs update
**What is the current behavior?**
The Prisma quickstart and troubleshooting pages reference Prisma v6
patterns: `prisma-client-js` generator, `datasource db` with
`url`/`directUrl`, CommonJS imports, `ts-node`, and no driver adapter
setup.
**What is the new behavior?**
Updated for Prisma ORM v7:
- Install steps use `tsx`, `@prisma/adapter-pg`, `dotenv`, and `pg`
- New step for `prisma.config.ts` with `dotenv/config` and `DIRECT_URL`
- Schema uses `prisma-client` generator with explicit output,
provider-only `datasource db`
- Removed old `datasource db { url, directUrl }` block from serverless
tab
- Test file uses ESM imports from `./generated/prisma/client` and
`PrismaPg` driver adapter
- Troubleshooting cross-schema example updated to match v7 patterns
**Additional context**
Prisma v7 requires driver adapters, moves datasource config to
`prisma.config.ts`, and deprecates the `prisma-client-js` generator in
favor of `prisma-client`.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Updated Prisma quickstart: refreshed install and setup steps, added a
new runtime configuration step, adjusted migration + generate workflow,
and replaced the test API example with an ESM-style, dotenv-powered
snippet.
* Refined troubleshooting examples: clarified schema configuration
syntax and improved multi-schema guidance.
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46082?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris@chrischinchilla.com>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR is add missing docs for the newly added wrappers:
- Cal
- Calendly
- Cloudflare D1
- DynamoDB
- Gravatar
- Hubspot
- Infura
- MySQL
- OpenApi
- Orb
- Shopify
- Slack
## What is the current behavior?
Those wrappers was added to Wrappers extension but docs links are not
updated.
## What is the new behavior?
- The missing wrappers docs are added.
- Removed the repetitive `Connecting to` title prefix in the Navigation.
- Collapse the lengthy wrappers list into a `Sources` sub navigation
item to make the UI tidy.
## Additional context
N/A
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Added guides for new federated data wrappers: Cal, Calendly,
Cloudflare D1, Gravatar, Infura, MySQL, OpenAPI, Shopify, and Slack.
* Reorganized Foreign Data Wrappers navigation menu with an improved
hierarchical structure for easier discovery of available vendor
integrations.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Docs update.
## What is the current behavior?
The troubleshooting entry
`edge-functions-worker-timeouts-and-websocket-drops.mdx` includes
frontmatter fields that are not part of the troubleshooting
template/schema, so it does not conform to the expected metadata shape.
## What is the new behavior?
The document now matches the supported troubleshooting template
metadata.
- **Frontmatter cleanup**
- Removed unsupported `teams` and `types` fields.
- Kept the existing supported metadata (`title`, `topics`, `keywords`)
unchanged.
- **Template alignment**
- Brings the page in line with
`/apps/docs/content/troubleshooting/_template.mdx`.
- Avoids schema drift for troubleshooting content.
```mdx
---
title = "Edge Functions worker timeouts and WebSocket drops"
topics = [ "functions" ]
keywords = [ "websocket", "timeout", "earlydrop", "wall clock", "cpu limit", "streaming", "cold start" ]
---
```
## Additional context
This is a surgical docs-only change to make the page consistent with the
troubleshooting content schema used by the docs app.
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Mansueli <rodrigo@mansueli.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Simplified the local setup instructions for running the docs site
during development.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
docs update
## What is the current behavior?
Storage RLS polices unintentionally allow list access to buckets
potentially setting a bad example for people starting a new project.
## What is the new behavior?
Use more restrictive RLS polices that only allow the intended operations
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Updated Supabase Storage access-control policies and examples across
docs and starter projects.
* Tightened avatar image access rules to require explicit operation
checks for public reads.
* Clarified guidance and added explanatory comments in migration and
README examples to illustrate the updated access patterns.
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46172?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Docs update
## What is the current behavior?
The dashboard branching guide doesn't mention that the first "Create
branch" action on a project requires Owner/Administrator access.
Combined with cosmetic UI behavior: the branch dropdown displays `main /
PRODUCTION` on every project from day one, even though the backend
hasn't registered a production branch yet. Developer-role users hit a
403 with a generic "Not authorized to enable preview branching" toast on
their first branch attempt, with no docs or UI hint that an implicit
production-branch registration step is happening.
Customer-reported in
[SU-383693](https://supabase.frontapp.com/open/cnv_1mz95u3i?key=wbyHQkruuZ_KYRGnRPB5_yHzm5-fr_k4)
## What is the new behavior?
Adds an admonition under the "Creating a branch" heading in the
dashboard-branching guide explaining:
- The cosmetic UI vs. backend state mismatch (`main / PRODUCTION` shown
before any row exists)
- That the first "Create branch" click is what technically enables
branching on the project (populates `preview_branches` with`is_default =
true`)
- This step requires Owner/Administrator access
- After that one-time step, anyone with the Developer role can create,
update, and delete preview branches
Scoped to the gitless dashboard flow only. The GitHub-integrated path
bootstraps automatically during admin-only integration setup.
## Additional context
- Mechanism confirmed with the team in
[Slack](https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C02BJ2239GA/p1779978863774239)
"the first time branching is used we populate the preview_branches table
with the base project and have is_default set as true. This is
technically what enables branching. A developer role can't do that."
- Related FE improvement being escalated separately (clearer error
message and/or disabling the Create branch button for Developers when
the production branch hasn't been registered yet)
- The [Branching 2.0
announcement](https://supabase.com/blog/branching-without-git-is-now-the-default)
(May 2026) made gitless branching the default for new projects, and more
customers can walk into the dashboard flow without ever touching GitHub
integration.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Added clarification on dashboard branching behavior when GitHub
integration is not configured, including details on branch dropdown
display and initial setup requirements with permission levels.
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46471?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Docs update
## What is the current behavior?
Currently, we have a doc that was created to provide details about
platform audit logs (organization level)
## What is the new behavior?
This adds a detail about account audit logs, which provide the same
details as the platform audit log. The difference is account audit logs
only show logs for the specific user account.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Enhanced Platform Audit Logs guide to clarify that each account has
access to separate Account Audit logs for tracking individual user
activity.
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46467?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Summary
Removes the preemptive 301 redirects from `/docs/llms.txt` and
`/docs/llms-full.txt` to root, and switches the docs homepage
`rel=alternate` to an absolute URL. The `/docs/*` paths never had a
producer in `apps/docs` (no route handler, no static file at
`public/llms.txt` or `public/llms-full.txt`); the redirects were cruft
from before the root paths were canonical. Now `/docs/llms*` cleanly
404s and the only advertised path is the root canonical per llmstxt.org.
## Changes
- Delete `/docs/llms.txt` and `/docs/llms-full.txt` 301 entries from
`apps/www/lib/redirects.js`
- Switch `apps/docs/app/page.tsx` rel=alternate `text/markdown` from
relative `/llms-full.txt` to absolute
`https://supabase.com/llms-full.txt`, so `basePath: '/docs'` does not
reconstruct the now-dead `/docs/llms-full.txt` path
## Testing
Verify on Vercel preview:
- [ ] `curl -sI -L <preview>/docs/llms.txt` returns 404 (no producer,
redirect removed)
- [ ] `curl -sI -L <preview>/docs/llms-full.txt` returns 404
- [ ] `curl -sI -L <preview>/llms.txt` returns 200 with `content-type:
text/plain`
- [ ] `curl -sI -L <preview>/llms-full.txt` returns 200, ~9 MB body
- [ ] `curl -s <preview>/docs/ | grep 'rel="alternate".*llms-full'`
shows the absolute `https://supabase.com/llms-full.txt` href (no
`/docs/` prefix)
Caveat: the absolute alternate URL points at production from preview
deploys. Acceptable because Vercel previews are `noindex` by default and
the existing `canonical: BASE_PATH` already crosses environments via
basePath resolution.
## Linear
- fixes GROWTH-881
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Updated documentation URL references to use absolute Supabase-hosted
paths
* Reorganized legacy product documentation redirects to new
markdown-based routes
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46468?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Adds details about error handling in the protocol and what users can
expect when handling them in client libs
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Expanded Realtime protocol "Error handling": describes four error
delivery paths, client lifecycle and recovery behaviors, and which
errors close or preserve channels.
* Clarifies join rejection parsing and retry/backoff guidance for join
error codes, plus special-case join reasons.
* Details channel-level system errors, Postgres subscription
degraded-state and ID-consistency rules, broadcast/presence error
shapes, in-band access_token refresh, and reconnection sequencing.
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46292?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature / abuse-prevention update. Resolves DEPR-198.
## What is the current behaviour?
Free projects using Supabase's built-in email service can edit raw Auth
email template subjects and HTML in Studio. That is the risky cohort
this project is trying to constrain.
## What is the new behaviour?
### Template editing restrictions
For free projects using Supabase's built-in email service, Studio keeps
Auth email templates viewable and previewable but disables subject/body
editing and saving. Editing is unlocked by setting up Custom SMTP,
configuring a send-email hook, or upgrading to a paid plan.
**Grandfathering:** projects created before `2026-06-01T00:00:00Z` (the
platform enforcement cutoff) are exempt; their editing UI stays
unlocked. This mirrors `FREE_TIER_TEMPLATE_BLOCK_CUTOFF_DATE` in the
platform PR exactly.
| After |
| --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Emails Authentication Fizz Test
Supabase-173BB09B-0FB9-4133-8202-9E310DDB347A"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c966212d-ed0c-443b-8197-440cc2937ef6"
/> |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Emails Authentication Fizz Test
Supabase-CD5845EB-0E45-4779-8989-44E775B2411A"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/055a64d6-b5e8-4d37-a261-6e280f04536a"
/> |
### Warning dialogs on transitions that reset templates
Two flows now surface a warning before the user commits to a state
change that resets their custom email templates to defaults:
1. **Disabling custom SMTP** (SMTP settings page): a confirmation dialog
warns that templates will be reset to defaults and the email rate limit
reduced to 2 per hour. On confirm, Studio resets all 13 templates via
the existing per-template reset endpoint (`Promise.allSettled`). The
"won't be able to edit" sentence is shown only for post-cutoff projects;
grandfathered projects skip it. The corresponding server-side
enforcement is in the Platform PR:
https://github.com/supabase/platform/pull/33129
2. **Downgrading to the Free plan** (billing settings): an admonition in
the existing downgrade confirmation modal warns that custom templates
will be reset to defaults and won't be editable without custom SMTP. The
admonition is shown only when the org has at least one post-cutoff
project; orgs whose projects are all grandfathered skip it.
| Custom SMTP | Downgrading |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="862" height="586" alt="66764"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6470c8a6-2f79-40a5-ad3b-bfe5b0ba9c54"
/> | <img width="1268" height="1552" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-22 at 17 28
37@2x-FEB1901E-38E6-42DF-8C27-0A036D8A1B94"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e8caa9e6-c3ed-4787-b771-af77a43eb854"
/> |
### Informational admonition when enabling SMTP
When a user enables custom SMTP for the first time, a sandwiched
admonition above the save footer informs them that the email rate limit
will be increased to 30 per hour and can be adjusted.
_This is just a minor cosmetic change, unrelated to the email template
disabling. Sorry._
| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Emails Authentication Chisel
Toolshed Supabase-54317D18-803C-4A58-8211-2359355D083B"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29eff649-02dc-40f3-a379-0b4d484a76c7"
/> | <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Emails Authentication Chisel
Toolshed Supabase-9E12399E-E9FB-4F9A-B029-A08008EA4B50"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e542ed86-4da6-407e-8293-0f4c0f071e18"
/> |
## How to test
All existing projects pre-date the enforcement cutoff
(`2026-06-01T00:00:00Z`) and are grandfathered, so the restriction UI
won't appear by default. To force the restricted state locally,
back-date the cutoff in one file:
In
`apps/studio/components/interfaces/Auth/EmailTemplates/EmailTemplates.utils.ts`,
temporarily change:
```ts
export const FREE_TIER_TEMPLATE_BLOCK_CUTOFF_DATE = '2026-06-01T00:00:00Z'
```
to:
```ts
export const FREE_TIER_TEMPLATE_BLOCK_CUTOFF_DATE = '2025-01-01T00:00:00Z'
```
Revert before committing. With the cutoff back-dated, use a free-plan
project and:
- **Template restriction + admonition:** navigate to Authentication >
Emails with no custom SMTP configured. Subject/body fields should be
read-only and the "Set up SMTP" admonition should appear, with its
dropdown offering upgrade and send-email hook options.
- **SMTP disable warning:** enable custom SMTP on a project, then
disable it via Authentication > SMTP Settings. The confirmation dialog
should warn that templates will reset to defaults and that editing will
be restricted after disabling.
- **Downgrade warning:** in billing settings, initiate a downgrade to
the Free plan. The downgrade modal should include an admonition warning
about template reset and restricted editing (only if the org has at
least one post-cutoff project).
## Additional context
The default Auth email template copy was also improved across docs,
examples, and UI library snippets (separate prior commits).
The per-template reset button (`ResetTemplateDialog`) was migrated to
the async `AlertDialogAction` pattern introduced in #45960; the dialog
stays open and shows a loading state while the reset is in-flight,
closes on success, and stays open on error.
Closes PRODSEC-183
---------
Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Morgan <stephen@doublethink.co.nz>
## Summary
Adds documentation for the new Logs pricing SKUs (Ingest and Query)
ahead of the July 1 launch. Part of the [O11Y Logs Pricing
RFC](https://linear.app/supabase/project/rfc-supabase-observability-product-packaging-and-pricing-77990c05a767)
rollout (PRD R6).
**This is the docs PR.** Pricing page changes (`apps/www`) and Studio
dashboard changes are separate PRs.
### New pages
- **Logs overview** (`manage-your-usage/logs.mdx`) — both SKUs at a
glance, summary pricing table, Logs vs Log Drains clarification
- **Logs Ingest detail** (`manage-your-usage/logs-ingest.mdx`) — full
billing details, invoice examples, optimization tips
- **Logs Query detail** (`manage-your-usage/logs-query.mdx`) — full
billing details, invoice examples, optimization tips
- **Pricing partials** for both SKUs (`pricing_logs_ingest.mdx`,
`pricing_logs_query.mdx`)
### Updated pages
- **Cost control** — added Logs Ingest + Logs Query to "Usage items
covered by the Spend Cap" list
- **Telemetry/logs** — added link to the new manage-usage overview page
- **Navigation sidebar** — added Logs, Logs Ingest, Logs Query entries
before Log Drains
### Notes
- Screenshots are marked as TODO placeholders — will be added once
Studio surfaces are live
- Follows the existing manage-usage page pattern (storage-size, MAU,
etc.)
- Canonical pricing: Ingest $0.50/GB over 5 GB, Query $0.002/GB over
1,000 GB (Free/Pro/Team)
## Test plan
- [x] Verify pages render at
`/docs/guides/platform/manage-your-usage/logs`, `/logs-ingest`,
`/logs-query`
- [x] Verify sidebar navigation shows new entries
- [x] Verify cost-control page lists both items under "covered by Spend
Cap"
- [x] Verify `<$Partial />` pricing tables render correctly
- [x] Verify telemetry/logs page shows new billing link
- [x] Verify no broken links
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Added guides for managing Logs, Logs Ingest, and Logs Query usage with
pricing, billing scenarios, quota examples, and optimization tips
* Added Platform → Billing navigation items: Logs, Logs Ingest, Logs
Query
* Included overage pricing tables, Spend Cap coverage updates, “Coming
soon” billing caveats, clarified Logs vs. Log Drains, and linked usage
management from the Logging guide
* **Chore**
* Whitelisted "Better Stack" in spelling checks
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46095?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.
YES
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Docs update (new guides + follow-up documentation fix from review
feedback).
## What is the current behavior?
There was no consolidated docs example for resumable WebSockets with
Edge Functions, and no dedicated troubleshooting guide for worker
timeouts / WebSocket drops.
## What is the new behavior?
- Adds a resumable WebSockets guide for Edge Functions, including:
- session persistence
- event replay
- idempotency pattern and schema examples
- client/server example flow
- Adds an Edge Functions troubleshooting guide for worker timeouts and
WebSocket drops.
- Updates docs navigation to surface the new guides.
- Follow-up fix from review feedback: the browser client example now
stores `sessionId` and `lastEventId` in `sessionStorage` (instead of
`localStorage`).
## Additional context
- Branch has been updated with latest `origin/master`.
- This PR remains documentation-focused; no production runtime code
changes were introduced.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Added a guide on resumable WebSockets covering session persistence,
event replay, idempotency patterns, SQL schema examples, and
client/server usage.
* Added a troubleshooting guide on Edge Functions worker timeouts and
WebSocket drops with scenarios, symptoms, and practical workarounds.
* Enhanced WebSocket docs with a production note on worker lifecycle and
keeping runtime promises open to avoid premature shutdown.
* Navigation updated to surface the new guides.
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46178?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Lakshan Perera <lakshan@supabase.io>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: CodeRabbit <noreply@coderabbit.ai>
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds a consumer-side guide for hardening npm installs of @supabase/*
packages: lockfile hygiene, minimum-release-age quarantine across
pnpm/yarn/npm/bun, private registries, provenance verification,
lifecycle script controls, blocking exotic transitive refs, Edge
Functions specifics, and an incident-response checklist.
Lives at guides/security/ alongside platform-security and
product-security; filesystem-driven sidebar picks it up automatically.
Originally drafted in supabase/supabase-js#2382 and moved here per
review.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Documentation**
* Added an npm security hardening guide (lockfile & CI practices,
release-age quarantines, transitive/exotic dependency controls,
provenance verification, lifecycle-script hardening, package-manager
pinning, CI/lockfile hygiene, Deno/Edge guidance, incident-response
checklist).
* Added a navigation entry for the new guide.
* Note: guide frontmatter contains unresolved merge-conflict markers.
* **Chores**
* Expanded spelling allowlist to include common tech terms (e.g.,
lockfile, sigstore, postinstall).
<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->
[](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/46384?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)
<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Chris Chinchilla <chris.ward@supabase.io>
Katerina Skroumpelou
