Commit Graph
8 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Gildas GarciaandIvan Vasilov 96d43099bb chore: refactor Button API so that it can be used a standard button (#46880)
## Problem

Our `<Button>` component breaks the default `button` contract by
redefining the `type` prop to set its variant (`primary`, `default`,
etc) instead of the button type (`submit`, `button`, etc).
This is confusing and forces to write more code when using it with
shadcn components that expect/inject the standard button props.

## Solution

- rename the `type` prop to `variant`
- rename the `htmlType` prop to `type`
- propagate the changes where necessary
- format code

## How to test

As this is just prop renaming, if it builds it's ok

---------

Co-authored-by: Ivan Vasilov <vasilov.ivan@gmail.com>
2026-06-16 23:59:58 +02:00
Danny White 1470c51021 fix(studio): align rls confirmation dialogs (#45961)
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Studio UI cleanup and docs update. Resolves FE-3217.

## What is the current behavior?

The table RLS confirmation dialogs differ across the Policies page and
Table Editor surfaces. The table editor disable flow also uses a verbose
confirmation modal with admonitions and repeated warning copy.

| Policies | Table Editor |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="852" height="448" alt="25125"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/baa9fafa-752c-4701-bf54-40da4e32030b"
/> | <img width="1108" height="1016" alt="57354"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b1b88355-be39-49b9-aed2-a60f20c25104"
/> |
| <img width="866" height="434" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-15 at 18 01
15@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d67f69ee-0a49-4dbd-939e-ca968361fc33"
/> | <img width="840" height="426" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-15 at 18 01
52@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a0b5f390-abeb-453f-8636-ad097f22308b"
/> |

## What is the new behavior?

Table RLS enable and disable confirmations now use one shared concise
Alert Dialog treatment across the Policies page, Table Editor header,
and Table Editor side panel. The server-backed toggles use the async
Alert Dialog action behaviour from the stacked base branch, and the
design-system docs now clarify when to start with Alert Dialog versus
Confirmation Modal.

This PR is stacked on #45960.

| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="852" height="448" alt="25125"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/baa9fafa-752c-4701-bf54-40da4e32030b"
/> | <img width="864" height="518" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-15 at 18 07
21@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bda53246-164b-4d5b-81a1-25d3bc661eb3"
/> |
| <img width="1108" height="1016" alt="57354"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b1b88355-be39-49b9-aed2-a60f20c25104"
/> | <img width="864" height="518" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-15 at 18 07
21@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bda53246-164b-4d5b-81a1-25d3bc661eb3"
/> |
| <img width="866" height="434" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-15 at 18 01
15@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d67f69ee-0a49-4dbd-939e-ca968361fc33"
/> | <img width="860" height="488" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-15 at 18 08
41@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c67f797-e2cd-4d56-a49d-e6c6fc0edff3"
/> |
| <img width="840" height="426" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-15 at 18 01
52@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a0b5f390-abeb-453f-8636-ad097f22308b"
/> | <img width="860" height="488" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-15 at 18 08
41@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c67f797-e2cd-4d56-a49d-e6c6fc0edff3"
/> |

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
* Refined guidance and wording for dialog usage, clarifying when to use
Alert Dialog, Confirmation Modal, and modal modality.

* **New Features**
* Reworked RLS confirmation flow with a streamlined toggle dialog,
clearer messaging, and a “Learn more” link to docs.

* **Tests**
* Updated end-to-end tests to cover the updated RLS dialog flows and
explanatory content.

<!-- review_stack_entry_start -->

[![Review Change
Stack](https://storage.googleapis.com/coderabbit_public_assets/review-stack-in-coderabbit-ui.svg)](https://app.coderabbit.ai/change-stack/supabase/supabase/pull/45961?utm_source=github_walkthrough&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=change_stack)

<!-- review_stack_entry_end -->
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-05-25 22:47:40 +00:00
Gildas Garcia 5c98bb6c0f chore: react-hook-form best practices (#44221)
## Problem

The design system documentation and examples promote an invalid usage of
react-hook-form state.

## Solution

- Fix the documentation and examples
- Update Claude skills for future components

## Out of scope

- Fix current code across the repository
2026-03-26 16:24:08 +01:00
Danny White 676c237422 fix(studio): prompt on unsaved changes in foreign key selector (#43888)
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix. Resolves FE-2802. Fixes #43882.

## What is the current behavior?

Second-level foreign key side panels in Table Editor can be dismissed
while dirty without a discard confirmation. That makes accidental
dismissal easy and is inconsistent with the shared dirty-form dismissal
pattern from FE-2802.

## What is the new behavior?

- Adds `DiscardChangesConfirmationDialog` handling to
`ForeignKeySelector`
- Guards all selector close paths behind a local dirty-state check
- Normalizes foreign key state so derived type metadata does not create
false dirty prompts
- Clarifies in `modality.mdx` that route-driven/page-unload flows should
use a navigation guard rather than the dialog/sheet close guard

| Dirty State | Dialog |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="1502" height="899" alt="test Table Editor AWS Healthy
Toolshed Supabase-D1EA9D5F-46EB-4DB5-830D-7CEF36A55B7E"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d866850-d062-4fb7-9949-2fd713e6088f"
/> | <img width="1502" height="899" alt="test Table Editor AWS Healthy
Toolshed Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1396361d-1d44-4206-862f-3379ea22be30"
/> |

## Additional context

Includes a focused unit test for foreign key dirty-state normalization.
2026-03-19 00:56:40 +00:00
Danny WhiteandJoshen Lim 8a5ad58f81 chore(studio): replace CloseConfirmationModal with DiscardChangesConfirmationDialog (#43430)
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Form handling improvement.

## What is the current behavior?

https://github.com/supabase/supabase/pull/43201/ standardised our
discard changes behaviour with a shared hook and
`DiscardChangesConfirmationDialog` component. But many forms and sheets
still:

1. Don’t have any Discard-confirm close behaviour, making it too easy to
make accidental discards
2. Use a more complicated, manually-created `CloseConfirmationModal`
approach

## What is the new behavior?

- Replaced all instances of `#2` above that had `CloseConfirmationModal`
with `DiscardChangesConfirmationDialog` and its hook
- Improved design system documentation around dirty form dismissal

| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="987" height="569" alt="Mercor Apexroles Foo
Supabase-9A40EC7C-F335-4B26-B567-450FC0845463"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/363bed82-34d2-4cc8-9164-6d18cfdbdbbc"
/> | <img width="987" height="569" alt="Mercor Apexroles Foo
Supabase-F427F1FA-DECC-4194-B663-A9E5A6F285A1"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d49fafdc-a5c2-46df-9b67-ec42bacbe716"
/> |

## To test

Try editing values these sheets in staging, then blurring the sheet or
pressing `esc`:

- CreateQueueSheet.tsx
- CronJobsTab.tsx
- CronJobPage.tsx
- EditWrapperSheet.tsx
- OverviewTab.tsx
- WrappersTab.tsx
- CreateFunction/index.tsx
- EditHookPanel.tsx
- TriggerSheet.tsx
- SidePanelEditor.tsx
- EditSecretSheet.tsx
- PolicyEditorModal/index.tsx
- PolicyEditorPanel/index.tsx

## Still to come

- [ ] Incrementally take on `#1`: implement
`DiscardChangesConfirmationDialog` and its hook in sheets or dialog
forms that have no dirty form dismissal handling

---------

Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
2026-03-06 03:17:35 +00:00
Danny WhiteandJoshen Lim aef1d70351 chore(studio): standardise discard changes behaviour (#43201)
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

UX consistency improvement. Updates DEPR-355.

## What is the current behavior?

Discard-confirm close behavioir is implemented inconsistently across
Studio forms:

- some sheets/dialogs used `useConfirmOnClose`
- some duplicated local `CloseConfirmationModal` components
- some (e.g. `CreateHookSheet`) closed unconditionally and could lose
unsaved changes

## What is the new behavior?

Extracts and validates a reusable discard-close pattern for
dialogs/sheets
- enhances `useConfirmOnClose` with `handleOpenChange(open)` for
`Dialog`/`Sheet` `onOpenChange`
- adds shared `DiscardChangesConfirmationDialog` (`AlertDialog`-based,
override-able copy)
- migrates:
	- `InviteMemberButton`
	- `CreateHookSheet`
	- `EditSecretSheet`

This standardizes close-guard behavior for
backdrop/escape/close-button/cancel-button flows without trying to block
route changes or arbitrary unmounts.

## Additional context

`CreateHookSheet` now also marks the generated secret action as dirty
(`setValue(..., { shouldDirty: true })`) so the discard guard behaves
correctly.

- Added tests for `useConfirmOnClose` covering:
	- clean vs dirty close
	- handleOpenChange(true|false)
	- confirm/cancel behavior
	- latest callback ref behavior

A follow-up PR is needed to migrate remaining duplicated
`CloseConfirmationModal` usages and older `useConfirmOnClose` call sites
to the shared `DiscardChangesConfirmationDialog` + `handleOpenChange`
pattern.

---------

Co-authored-by: Joshen Lim <joshenlimek@gmail.com>
2026-03-05 11:32:39 +11:00
Danny White 92bcdcd953 Update delete-organization dialog to TextConfirmModal (#42670)
## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

- ~Feat~ Chore
- Resolves DEPR-33

## What is the current behavior?

The dialog used to delete an organization uses a ”type this org’s name
in before you can press this button” interaction but:

- A) Enables the button the whole time
- B) We already have this componentized in TextConfirmModal

## What is the new behavior?

- Refactored this dialog to use `TextConfirmModal` instead
- Updated design docs to make this prop clearer

| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/85c965f6-29d4-4696-8c0c-a54ddcbe6167"
/> | <img width="1024" height="759" alt="Supabase"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a96ca65-15c3-4b1b-bb10-620526c059b8"
/> |

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
* Updated Text Confirm Dialog documentation with clarifications: the
confirm action remains disabled until input exactly matches the required
string, and leading/trailing whitespace is trimmed from the input.

* **Refactor**
* Streamlined the organization deletion confirmation workflow for
improved user experience.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-02-11 16:40:33 +11:00
Danny Whiteandcoderabbitai[bot] f6e8207e6d docs(design-system) add dialog pattern documentation (#41296)
* docs

* naming

* docs

* mini fix

* update policies component

* use destructured prop

* rls policies dialogs

* custom domain dialogs

* restart server dialog

* remove ConfirmDialog (aka ConfirmModal)

* docs updates

* remove unrelated work

* remove unrelated work

* remove unrelated work

* confirmation-modal demo

* use indicative components

* links

* tiny docs updates

* examples

* sheets and alert dialog examples

* docs and examples

* docs

* docs

* text confirm modal

* docs

* docs

* revert cursor rules

* fixes

* fix links

* Update apps/design-system/registry/examples.ts

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* rabbit

* rabbit

* use variants

---------

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-12-17 11:24:36 +00:00