From 540c4c2fccbc0386d191ea32916a7cb280bcf903 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Copplestone Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:37:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] hide copy button on code block --- www/_blog/2021-07-26-supabase-postgres-13.mdx | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/www/_blog/2021-07-26-supabase-postgres-13.mdx b/www/_blog/2021-07-26-supabase-postgres-13.mdx index e029b8aef48..4425dfe0251 100644 --- a/www/_blog/2021-07-26-supabase-postgres-13.mdx +++ b/www/_blog/2021-07-26-supabase-postgres-13.mdx @@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ Below is a comparison between the ARM versions of Supabase Postgres `0.15.0` and and follow the PostgreSQL configuration [here](https://www.percona.com/blog/2021/01/22/postgresql-on-arm-based-aws-ec2-instances-is-it-any-good/). The following configuration of `pgbench` was used. -```bash +```bash hideCopy pgbench -i -s 150 ``` Running the benchmark with 2, 4, 8, 16, 64, and 128 clients: -```bash +```bash hideCopy pgbench -P 5 -c {num_clients} -j {num_clients} -T 300 -M prepared postgres ```