The issue here seems to be that
the `panic!` and `unreachable!()` macros used in the tests return `!`.
In the future, `!` will not fallback to `()`, which is what `dependency_on_unit_never_type_fallback` checks.
`add_event_handler` expects a function that returns an `EventHandlerResult`, but it is only implemented for `()`, not for `!`.
A solution could be to implement that trait for `!` but it is an unstable feature right now.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
It is only needed with the experimental-oidc and e2e-encryption features.
The former is less likely to be enabled so use it to enable the dependency.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
This patch set does two things:
1. Extracted the logic to collect the devices that should receive a room key.
2. Introduce a new CollectStrategy enum which defines which rules are
used to collect recipient devices for a room key. Currently only the
existing rules have beenmoved under this enum.
This can happen if there's a load-balancer or any modification of the
response by a reverse proxy (e.g. rewrite 5XX errors into 429, to not
let a reverse proxy mark the upstream server as being down, as
Cloudflare seems to do).
As a result, such requests will be retried in multiple places, including
when sending something with the send queue. Also, the send queue will
mark these errors as recoverable instead of unrecoverable.
No test, because the change really is trivial and a regression test
didn't seem worth it, for once.
RoomInfo::handle_state_event(...) will check this condition so we don't have to later ask the HS whether the room is encrypted or not through room::is_encrypted().
Also, as we need some way to get this info in the room list in our clients, two ways of doing this were added the FFI crate, one through RoomInfo and another one through RoomListItem.
`RoomInfo::handle_state_event` will check this condition so we don't have to later ask the HS whether the room is encrypted or not through `room::is_encrypted()`.
Fixes#3538
The current implementation for send_reply and edit only work with timeline items that have already been paginated.
However given the fact that by restoring drafts, we may restore a reply to an event for timeline where such event has not been paginated, sending such reply would fail (same for the edit event).
So I reworked a bit the code here to use. only the event id, and reuse the existing timeline if available, otherwise we can fetch the event and synthethise the content and still be able to successfully send the event.
This is the third part of the breakdown of the following PR: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/pull/3439
Change this so that it fires off a task for each UTD event, rather than each
megolm session. This is a step towards considering the message index when
deciding whether to carry on with the download.
Damir Jelić